vivo Y52 5G vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is the clear winner for performance and charging speed, thanks to its Snapdragon 870 and 120W charging. However, the vivo Y52 5G offers a more affordable entry point for those prioritizing 5G connectivity and a decent overall experience without breaking the bank.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y52 5G | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 18 | 2022, March 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 20 | Available. Released 2022, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 163.8 x 76.3 x 10 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 144Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 12, Joy UI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4650 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shiny Black, Glacier Blue | Black, White, Gray |
| Models | V2053 | SHARK PAR-A0 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 600 EUR |
vivo Y52 5G
- Affordable 5G connectivity
- Decent battery life
- Good for everyday use
- Sleek design
- Lower performance
- Slower charging
- LCD display
- Less versatile camera
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- Exceptional performance
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- High refresh rate display
- Dedicated gaming features
- Versatile camera system
- Higher price
- Gaming-focused design may not appeal to everyone
- Potentially shorter battery life due to higher power consumption
Display Comparison
The Black Shark 5 typically features a high refresh rate AMOLED display (often 144Hz) offering smoother visuals and vibrant colors, a significant advantage for gaming. The vivo Y52 5G likely has an LCD display with a standard refresh rate, providing adequate clarity but lacking the premium feel of the Black Shark 5's screen. Expect better outdoor visibility on the Y52 5G due to LCD technology.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Black Shark 5 generally has a more versatile camera system with potentially better image processing. The Y52 5G's camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but it won't match the Black Shark 5's capabilities in low light or with complex scenes. Expect the Black Shark 5 to have better video recording capabilities.
Performance
Here, the Black Shark 5 dominates. The Snapdragon 870 is significantly more powerful than the Dimensity 700, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The Black Shark 5's cooling system also helps maintain performance during extended gaming sessions, something the Y52 5G will likely struggle with.
Battery Life
The Black Shark 5's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging times. The vivo Y52 5G's 18W charging is considerably slower. While battery capacity might be similar, the Black Shark 5's charging speed provides a significant advantage in terms of convenience.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y52 5G is ideal for users seeking a reliable 5G phone for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming on a budget. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 is the go-to choice for mobile gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance, fast charging, and dedicated gaming features.