vivo Y52 5G vs Oppo Reno6 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno6 5G emerges as the stronger choice thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and likely superior camera capabilities. While the vivo Y52 5G offers decent value, the Reno6 5G provides a more premium experience overall.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y52 5G | Oppo Reno6 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 7, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 18 | 2021, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 20 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shiny Black, Glacier Blue | Stellar Black, Aurora, Blue, Purple |
| Models | V2053 | PEQM00, CPH2251 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 146.99 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 362450 (v8), 430765 (v9) GeekBench: 2131 (v5.1) |
vivo Y52 5G
- Good value for money
- Reliable 5G connectivity
- Decent battery life
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Basic camera system
- Lower display brightness
Oppo Reno6 5G
- Faster chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Significantly faster charging (65W)
- Likely superior camera
- Brighter display
- Premium design
- Higher price
- Battery life endurance rating is nominal and may not reflect real-world usage
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, but the Oppo Reno6 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 632 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. The 'infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the Reno6 5G is a nominal value, but suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Y52 5G's display is likely good, but not as bright or visually impressive.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Oppo Reno6 5G is expected to have a more advanced camera system. Oppo is known for its camera optimization, and the Dimensity 900 chipset typically supports more advanced camera features. Details on the Y52 5G's camera are scarce, suggesting it's a more basic setup.
Performance
The Oppo Reno6 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset (6nm) is a noticeable upgrade over the vivo Y52 5G's Dimensity 700 (7nm). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The Reno6 5G's CPU architecture (Cortex-A78 cores) also contributes to its superior performance.
Battery Life
Both phones claim an endurance rating of 109 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Oppo Reno6 5G's 65W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the vivo Y52 5G's 18W charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y52 5G is a good option for budget-conscious users who prioritize a reliable 5G connection and basic smartphone functionality. The Oppo Reno6 5G is ideal for users who want a faster processor, quicker charging, a better camera, and a more refined design, and are willing to spend a bit more.