vivo Y52 5G vs Oppo A74 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more efficient processor, the vivo Y52 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, offers a performance edge over the 8nm Snapdragon 480 in the Oppo A74 5G, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming experiences.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y52 5G | Oppo A74 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 18 | 2021, April 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 20 | Available. Released 2021, April 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 74.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 (single lane) | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shiny Black, Glacier Blue | Fluid Black, Space Silver |
| Models | V2053 | CPH2197, CPH2263 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 150 EUR |
vivo Y52 5G
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 700)
- More efficient 7nm fabrication process
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Brand recognition may be lower than Oppo
- Software updates may be less frequent
Oppo A74 5G
- Qualcomm's established software ecosystem
- Wider brand recognition
- Potentially more readily available accessories
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 480)
- Less efficient 8nm fabrication process
- May exhibit more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood: the chipset's ability to drive the display efficiently. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable, the Dimensity 700's more powerful GPU could potentially offer slightly smoother scrolling and animations. Bezels are expected to be similar, prioritizing affordability over ultra-slim designs.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely employ similar sensor configurations, focusing on a primary sensor for everyday photography. The aperture and sensor size of the main camera will be the most critical factors, but these are unknown. Image processing will differ between vivo and Oppo, with vivo typically leaning towards more vibrant colors and Oppo aiming for a more natural look. The presence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices is largely marketing fluff and shouldn't heavily influence your decision.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y52 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz versus the Oppo A74 5G’s Snapdragon 480 (8nm) with 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 cores. This architectural advantage, coupled with the smaller 7nm fabrication process, translates to better single-core and multi-core performance for the vivo. The Dimensity 700’s GPU is also more capable, offering a noticeable advantage in gaming. The 8nm Snapdragon 480, while still competent, will likely exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load. The Y52 5G will benefit users who engage in more demanding tasks like video editing or graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds – approximately 2-3 hours for a full charge. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the target market, both are likely in the 5000mAh range. The Dimensity 700’s 7nm process offers better power efficiency, potentially translating to slightly longer battery life for the vivo Y52 5G, even with a similar capacity battery. This efficiency advantage means the Y52 5G can maintain performance for longer periods without significant throttling, indirectly extending usable battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y52 5G if you need a phone that handles everyday tasks and light gaming with a bit more headroom, and if you value a processor built on a more efficient node. Buy the Oppo A74 5G if you prefer Qualcomm's software ecosystem and are primarily focused on basic smartphone functionality like calling, texting, and social media, and are less concerned with demanding applications.