vivo Y52 5G vs OnePlus Nord N10 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord N10 5G emerges as the slightly better choice. Its 30W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the measured 440 nits brightness provides a more usable outdoor experience. While the vivo Y52 5G’s Dimensity 700 offers a slight CPU advantage, the Nord N10’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y52 5G | OnePlus Nord N10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 18 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 20 | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shiny Black, Glacier Blue | Midnight Ice |
| Models | V2053 | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279579 (v8) GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y52 5G
- Potentially slightly faster CPU performance due to Cortex-A76 cores.
- Competitive 5G connectivity.
- May be available at a lower price point depending on region.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Lack of detailed display specifications.
- Limited camera information.
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- Faster 30W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Brighter display (440 nits) for better outdoor visibility.
- Higher contrast ratio (1447:1) for a more vibrant image.
- Slightly less powerful CPU core configuration.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Software updates may be less frequent than some competitors.
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 440 nits, a crucial advantage for outdoor use compared to the unlisted brightness of the vivo Y52 5G. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the Nord N10’s 1447:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and a more vibrant image. The absence of detailed display specs for the Y52 5G makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Nord N10 clearly has the edge in visual clarity and usability in bright conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones target the entry-level camera market, focusing on basic functionality rather than advanced features. The absence of information suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography or offer significant image quality advantages.
Performance
Both phones are powered by 5G-capable chipsets, but their architectures differ. The vivo Y52 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm), featuring a Cortex-A76 based CPU core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The OnePlus Nord N10 5G employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G (8nm) with a Kryo 560 configuration (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver). The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 690 generally translates to better power efficiency, while the Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores offer a slight advantage in single-core performance. However, real-world differences will likely be minimal for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y52 5G and OnePlus Nord N10 5G achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Nord N10 5G supports 30W wired charging, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Y52 5G’s 18W charging. This difference in charging speed is a major practical advantage for the Nord N10, reducing downtime and making it more convenient for users who frequently need to recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y52 5G if you prioritize raw CPU performance for multitasking and light gaming, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you value faster charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more established software experience, even if it means a slight trade-off in peak processing power.