The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y51a and Motorola Moto G60S both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Y51a focuses on Qualcomm’s efficiency, while the G60S prioritizes raw processing power with MediaTek’s Helio G95. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G60S emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Snapdragon 662 in the Y51a, making it better suited for gaming and demanding apps. The significantly faster 50W charging is a game-changer, offsetting the slightly less efficient chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 08 | 2021, August 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 23 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 169.7 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| | - | Water repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 562 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, 70% in 67 min | 50W wired, QC4 |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Sapphire, Crystal Symphony | Green, Blue |
| Models | V2031 | XT2133-2, XT2133-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.87 W/kg (head) 0.39 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y51a
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to the Snapdragon 662's 11nm process.
- Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chipset generally offers good software support.
- Likely a more streamlined and stable software experience.
- Significantly slower charging speed (18W vs 50W).
- Less powerful processor, resulting in lower performance in demanding tasks.
Motorola Moto G60S
- Much faster 50W charging with QC4 support.
- More powerful MediaTek Helio G95 processor for gaming and multitasking.
- Likely better image processing capabilities due to the more powerful chipset.
- Helio G95 may consume more power than the Snapdragon 662.
- MediaTek chipsets sometimes receive less consistent software updates.
Display Comparison
Neither phone boasts a standout display. Details on panel type and resolution are missing, but both likely utilize IPS LCDs common in this price bracket. The key difference lies in processing power, which impacts UI smoothness. While both will likely offer adequate viewing angles and color reproduction, the G60S’s more powerful GPU will contribute to a more responsive experience when scrolling and navigating the interface.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the G60S’s processing power will likely enable more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Y51a’s Snapdragon 662 ISP is capable, but the G95 offers more headroom for computational photography. It’s reasonable to assume the G60S will deliver more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The prevalence of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices suggests they are primarily for marketing purposes and offer limited real-world benefit.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G60S’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) is the clear winner in terms of raw performance. Its octa-core configuration, featuring two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, provides a significant advantage over the Snapdragon 662’s (11nm) Kryo 260 cores. The G95’s architecture is more modern, translating to better multi-core performance and improved graphics capabilities. While the Snapdragon 662 is efficient, the G95 offers a more substantial uplift for gaming and demanding applications. The 12nm process node of the Helio G95 will draw more power than the 11nm Snapdragon 662, but the performance gains are likely worth the trade-off for power users.
Battery Life
The Moto G60S’s 50W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) is a massive advantage. The Y51a’s 18W charging feels comparatively slow. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the G60S’s faster charging significantly reduces downtime. A full charge from 0-100% on the G60S will take considerably less time (likely under an hour) than the Y51a’s 67 minutes to reach 70%. This difference is crucial for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y51a if you prioritize long-term battery life and a consistently smooth, if not blazing-fast, experience for everyday tasks like browsing and social media. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily game or run resource-intensive applications. Buy the Motorola Moto G60S if you value performance, especially for gaming, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast charging. This phone is better suited for users who push their devices harder and want to minimize downtime.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G60S overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G95 is known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 662. However, Motorola typically implements thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating. While some throttling may occur during prolonged, intensive gaming, it’s unlikely to be severe enough to render the phone unusable. The larger chassis of the G60S also aids in heat dissipation.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y51a slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Yes, 18W charging is noticeably slower than the 50W charging on the Moto G60S. While it will still charge overnight, users who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up will find the Y51a’s charging speed limiting. The 67 minutes to 70% charge highlights this deficiency.
❓ Does the Moto G60S support high refresh rate displays for smoother scrolling?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specs, many phones with the Helio G95 chipset support 120Hz displays. However, the Y51a and G60S specifications do not confirm this. Expect a standard 60Hz refresh rate on both devices.
