The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y51a and Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Y51a leans on Qualcomm's efficiency, while the Note 10 Pro NFC prioritizes raw processing power with MediaTek's Helio G95. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and efficient power management, the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC emerges as the stronger contender. Its Helio G95 chipset, coupled with 33W fast charging, offers a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks and quicker top-ups, despite the Y51a's respectable Snapdragon 662.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 08 | 2021, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 23 | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, 70% in 67 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Sapphire, Crystal Symphony | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret |
| Models | V2031 | X695C |
| Price | About 200 EUR | - |
| SAR | 0.87 W/kg (head) 0.39 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y51a
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 offers stable performance.
- Potentially better software optimization from vivo.
- Generally good battery efficiency.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Less powerful processor compared to the Helio G95.
- Likely less advanced camera system.
Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC
- More powerful MediaTek Helio G95 processor.
- Significantly faster 33W charging.
- Likely better camera performance.
- MediaTek chipsets sometimes have more bloatware.
- Potentially slightly lower battery efficiency due to more powerful processor.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on processing power. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The absence of high refresh rates on either device suggests a focus on battery life over visual fluidity. Bezels are expected to be moderate, typical of budget offerings.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC likely features a more sophisticated camera system. The Helio G95’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally supports higher resolution sensors and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Y51a likely relies on Qualcomm’s ISP, which is competent but less feature-rich. Expect the Note 10 Pro NFC to deliver better image quality in challenging lighting conditions and potentially offer more versatile shooting modes. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility; focusing on the main sensor quality is more important.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) is built on a smaller process node than the vivo Y51a’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm). This generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance for the Helio G95. The G95’s CPU configuration – 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers a more potent high-performance core cluster compared to the Snapdragon 662’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver. This will be noticeable in gaming and app loading times. While the Snapdragon 662 is a capable chip, the Helio G95 provides a clear edge in sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s 33W charging is a significant advantage over the vivo Y51a’s 18W charging. The 33W charger can replenish the battery much faster, reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. The Snapdragon 662’s efficiency contributes to good battery life on the Y51a, but the Note 10 Pro NFC’s faster charging provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y51a if you need a reliable daily driver with a focus on stable performance for basic tasks and appreciate Qualcomm's generally optimized software experience. Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC if you prefer a more powerful processor for gaming and multitasking, and value significantly faster charging speeds to minimize downtime. The Note 10 Pro NFC is the better choice for media consumption and those who frequently use resource-intensive apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Helio G95 is a powerful chip, it can generate heat under sustained load. However, Infinix typically implements thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating. Expect some throttling during extended gaming, but the Note 10 Pro NFC should generally maintain playable frame rates for most titles. The 12nm process node is more efficient than older designs, helping to control temperatures.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y51a slow compared to other phones in this price range?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 33W charging offered by the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC. While it's not unusable, it will take considerably longer to fully charge the device. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours, whereas the Note 10 Pro NFC can achieve a full charge in around an hour.
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in app loading times between the Snapdragon 662 and the Helio G95?
Yes, you should notice a difference. The Helio G95’s more powerful CPU cores and improved architecture will result in faster app loading times, especially for larger and more complex applications. The difference will be most noticeable when switching between multiple apps.
