Realme 7 Pro vs vivo Y51 (2020): Which Budget Snapdragon Wins?

The Realme 7 Pro and vivo Y51 (2020) represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Realme 7 Pro, launched with a focus on performance and rapid charging, clashes with the more conservatively-specced vivo Y51, aimed at essential smartphone functionality. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Realme 7 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Y51’s Snapdragon 665, and the 65W charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just 34 minutes. While the Y51 offers affordability, the 7 Pro’s advantages justify the price difference.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo Y51 (2020, September) Realme 7 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 401, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia
Launch
Announced2020, September 15. Released 2020, September 192020, September 03. Released 2020, September 14
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions159.3 x 75.2 x 8.7 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.34 in)160.9 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.34 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight186.7 g (6.60 oz)182 g (6.42 oz)
 -Water-repellent coating
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3+
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density)
Size6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm)Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 618
OSAndroid 10, Funtouch 10Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
 -UFS 2.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired65W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 34 min
Type4500 mAh4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsMystic Black, Jazzy Blue, Dreamy WhiteMirror Blue, Mirror Silver
Models-RMX2170
PriceAbout 180 EURAbout 190 EUR
SAR-0.73 W/kg (head)     0.52 W/kg (body)
Pricing
128GB 8GB RAM-Rp 3,498,000
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 113h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -24.8 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 278414(v8) GeekBench: 1811 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo Y51 (2020, September)

  • More affordable price point
  • Decent battery endurance
  • Reliable Snapdragon 665 chipset for basic tasks

  • Significantly slower charging speed
  • Less powerful processor for demanding applications
  • Display likely less bright than the Realme 7 Pro

Realme 7 Pro

  • Much faster 65W charging
  • More powerful Snapdragon 720G processor
  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility

  • Higher price compared to the vivo Y51
  • Battery life is similar to the Y51 despite faster charging
  • Camera details are limited

Display Comparison

The Realme 7 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 585 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y51. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher peak brightness of the Realme 7 Pro translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. The panel technology is not specified for either device, but the Realme 7 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for users who consume media outdoors or in brightly lit environments.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for both. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme 7 Pro’s more powerful processor likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of details on the Y51’s camera suggests a more basic imaging experience.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Realme 7 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 720G (8nm) while the vivo Y51 is equipped with the Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 720G’s Kryo 465 cores (2x2.3 GHz Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Silver) offer a substantial performance uplift over the 665’s Kryo 260 cores (4x2.0 GHz Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Silver). The 8nm process node of the 720G also contributes to improved power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Realme 7 Pro will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease.

Battery Life

Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the unspecified mAh capacities. However, the Realme 7 Pro’s 65W wired charging is a massive advantage. It can reach 50% charge in just 12 minutes and a full charge in 34 minutes, drastically reducing downtime. The vivo Y51’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly longer to replenish the battery.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo Y51 (2020, September) if you prioritize absolute affordability and only need a phone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use. Buy the Realme 7 Pro if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and if quick charging is a must-have feature for your lifestyle. The 7 Pro is also the better option for those who plan to keep their phone for several years.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Snapdragon 665 in the vivo Y51 sufficient for playing PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 665 can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a smooth experience. Expect some stuttering during intense firefights. The Realme 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G will provide a significantly smoother and more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the Realme 7 Pro compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y51 in real-world use?
The 65W charging on the Realme 7 Pro is dramatically faster. It can charge from 0-100% in approximately 34 minutes, while the vivo Y51’s 18W charging will likely take well over 2 hours for a full charge. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Realme 7 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 720G, coupled with the Realme 7 Pro’s thermal management system, generally handles prolonged gaming well. While some warming is expected, it’s unlikely to reach critical temperatures that cause significant performance throttling. The 8nm process node contributes to better thermal efficiency compared to the 11nm Snapdragon 665.