The vivo Y51 (2015) and Y67 were popular budget smartphones offering a blend of features and affordability. But which one holds up better today? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you decide which device is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Y67 edges out the Y51 thanks to its octa-core processor and generally better performance. While the Y51 boasts incredibly fast charging, the Y67's smoother operation and slightly improved camera make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 - Malaysia | 1, 3, 5, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | LTE 900 / 1800 / 2100 - Thailand, Indonesia | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, December. Released 2015, December | 2016, November. Released 2016, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 143.8 x 71.7 x 7.5 mm (5.66 x 2.82 x 0.30 in) | 153.8 x 75.5 x 7.6 mm (6.06 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | 157 g (5.54 oz) | 154 g (5.43 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 540 x 960 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~220 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~66.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~71.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 306 | Mali-T860MP2 |
| OS | Android 5.0.2 (Lollipop), Funtouch 2.5 | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), Funtouch 2.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 4.5 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm
5 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Auto-HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min (advertised) | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 2350 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White | Gold, Pink Gold |
| Models | Y51L, Y51, 1707, Y51A | Y67L |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 270 EUR |
vivo Y51 (2015)
- Incredibly fast 65W charging
- Compact size
- Affordable
- Outdated processor
- Lower performance
- Potentially less responsive UI
vivo Y67
- Better performance (octa-core)
- Slightly improved camera
- More modern design
- Slower charging compared to Y51
- May be slightly more expensive (depending on availability)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 5.0-inch display, likely with similar resolutions (720p). The Y67 might have slightly better color accuracy due to its more modern chipset, but the difference would be minimal. Expect similar viewing experiences overall.
Camera Comparison
The Y67 generally has a slightly better camera setup. While both likely feature 13MP rear cameras, the Y67's processor allows for better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. The Y67 also likely has a front-facing camera with slightly better resolution.
Performance
This is where the Y67 shines. Its Mediatek MT6750 octa-core processor offers a significant performance advantage over the Y51's Snapdragon 410 quad-core. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Y67.
Battery Life
The Y51 (2015) is the clear winner here. Its advertised 65W charging is incredibly fast, capable of charging the battery in under 40 minutes. The Y67 likely has a standard charging speed, taking considerably longer to reach full charge.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y51 (2015) is a good option for users prioritizing extremely fast charging and are on a very tight budget. The vivo Y67 is ideal for those seeking a more responsive experience, a slightly better camera, and a more modern design, even if it means sacrificing the Y51's charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo Y51 (2015) still worth buying?
Only if you absolutely prioritize incredibly fast charging and are on a very limited budget. Otherwise, the Y67 offers a better overall experience.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo Y67 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful octa-core processor.
❓ What is the battery capacity of each phone?
The vivo Y51 (2015) had a 2500mAh battery, while the vivo Y67 had a 3000mAh battery. However, the Y51's charging speed is the key differentiator.
