The vivo Y50t and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches. The Y50t focuses on efficiency with the Snapdragon 720G, while the Poco X3 Pro swings for the fences with the more powerful Snapdragon 860. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset offers a significant leap over the Y50t’s Snapdragon 720G. However, the vivo Y50t remains a viable option for everyday tasks and users on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, OriginOS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | V2023EA | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y50t
- Potentially more power efficient due to the Snapdragon 720G.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Snapdragon 860.
- Slower charging speed (18W).
- Limited gaming capabilities.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Superior performance with the Snapdragon 860.
- Faster 33W charging.
- Better suited for gaming and demanding applications.
- Potentially lower battery efficiency under heavy load.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Larger size and weight (likely, based on chipset and battery).
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution, refresh rate, and panel type are missing for the Y50t. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond contrast, benefits from the chipset’s ability to drive higher refresh rates, potentially offering a smoother visual experience. Without knowing the Y50t’s panel technology, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the Poco.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s positioning as a performance-focused device, it’s reasonable to assume a more capable camera system, potentially with larger sensors and more advanced features. The Y50t likely prioritizes cost savings in this area. The absence of details suggests neither phone will challenge flagship camera performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y50t’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 860 features a 1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold core, alongside three additional Gold cores clocked at 2.42 GHz, and four Silver cores at 1.78 GHz, compared to the Y50t’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver. This translates to significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, particularly noticeable in demanding games and multitasking. The 7nm process node of the 860 also contributes to better power efficiency under heavy load, potentially mitigating throttling. While the Y50t is adequate for everyday tasks, the X3 Pro is built for sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging (59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min) is a significant advantage over the Y50t’s 18W charging. This faster charging speed minimizes downtime and provides a more convenient user experience. While the mAh capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Poco X3 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y50t if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption, and value a more efficient processor. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and faster overall performance, and are willing to trade some battery efficiency for that power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known for its efficient performance. While it can get warm, Xiaomi typically implements thermal management solutions to prevent significant throttling. The 7nm process node also contributes to better heat dissipation compared to older chipsets.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y50t slow compared to modern standards?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 33W charging on the Poco X3 Pro and many other current smartphones. Expect a significantly longer time to fully charge the Y50t.
❓ Can the vivo Y50t handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The vivo Y50t can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 720G is not as powerful as the 860, so don’t expect a high-end gaming experience.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support high refresh rate displays for smoother gaming?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, the Snapdragon 860 is capable of driving high refresh rate displays (90Hz or 120Hz). It's highly probable the Poco X3 Pro features a display with a refresh rate higher than the standard 60Hz, enhancing the gaming experience.
