The vivo Y50t and Xiaomi Mi A3 are both contenders in the budget smartphone arena, offering compelling features at accessible prices. But which one truly delivers the best experience? This in-depth comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses, helping you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Y50t boasts a more powerful processor and potentially better display, while the Xiaomi Mi A3 shines with exceptional battery life and a clean Android experience. For performance-focused users, the Y50t wins. For those prioritizing longevity and stock Android, the Mi A3 is the better choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2019, July 17. Released 2019, July 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm (6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 173.8 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10, OriginOS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, QC3 |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4030 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Kind of Gray, Not just Blue, More than White |
| Models | V2023EA | M1906F9SH, M1906F9SI |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.53 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.30 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.7dB / Crosstalk -93.0dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 74dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 81dB
|
| Performance | - |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 2345Basemark X: 17948 |
vivo Y50t
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 720G)
- Potentially better display
- Modern design
- Faster charging (likely)
- Battery life likely shorter than Mi A3
- Camera details limited
- Software experience may be more customized
Xiaomi Mi A3
- Exceptional battery life (101h endurance rating)
- Clean Android experience (close to stock)
- Reliable camera
- Compact design
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 665)
- Lower display brightness
- Older model
Display Comparison
The vivo Y50t likely features a more modern display panel with potentially better color accuracy and brightness, although specific brightness figures are unavailable. The Xiaomi Mi A3's 363 nits max brightness is adequate but not exceptional. Contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' which is a nominal value and doesn't reflect real-world performance. Overall, the Y50t likely has a slight edge in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable cameras for their price range. The Mi A3 is known for its reliable image processing and consistent results. The Y50t's camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a definitive comparison, but the more powerful processor could potentially allow for better image processing and features. Both likely offer standard camera features like HDR and portrait mode.
Performance
The Snapdragon 720G in the vivo Y50t is significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 665 in the Xiaomi Mi A3. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Y50t's 8nm process also contributes to improved efficiency compared to the Mi A3's 11nm.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi A3 is the clear winner in this category. Its endurance rating of 101 hours is outstanding, significantly outperforming the vivo Y50t. While the Y50t's battery capacity is likely comparable, the Mi A3's efficient chipset contributes to its exceptional battery life.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo Y50t? Gamers and users who prioritize smooth performance and a vibrant display. Who should buy the Xiaomi Mi A3? Users who value long battery life, a clean Android experience (close to stock), and a reliable camera for everyday photos.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo Y50t is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 720G processor.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Mi A3 receive software updates?
As a part of the Android One program, the Mi A3 used to receive timely updates, but support has largely ended. The Y50t's update schedule will depend on vivo's policies.
