The vivo Y series is known for offering impressive features at affordable prices. The vivo Y50t and Y50 are two popular contenders in this space, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Y50t emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset, faster charging, and generally improved performance. While the Y50 remains a decent budget option, the Y50t offers a noticeable upgrade for a relatively small price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2020, April 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2020, April 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.38 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10, OriginOS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Starry Black, Iris Blue, Iris Blue, Pearl White |
| Models | V2023EA | 1935, V1965A |
| Price | About 190 EUR | ₹ 18,000 |
vivo Y50t
- More powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Faster 18W charging
- Slightly better image processing
- Good battery life
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Macro camera is often redundant
vivo Y50
- Affordable price
- Long battery life
- Decent camera for basic photography
- Slower Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Slower 15W charging
- Less responsive performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.53-inch IPS LCD display with a 1080 x 2340 resolution. While the panels are similar in size and resolution, the Y50t might offer slightly better color accuracy due to its newer chipset's image processing capabilities. However, the difference is likely minimal and not a deciding factor for most users.
Camera Comparison
The vivo Y50 boasts a quad-camera setup (13MP main + 2MP depth + 2MP macro + 2MP monochrome), while the Y50t features a triple-camera setup (48MP main + 8MP ultrawide + 2MP macro). While the megapixel count is higher on the Y50t's main sensor, image quality is often dependent on software processing. Both phones offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance is likely to be similar. The Y50t's newer chipset may provide slightly better image processing.
Performance
This is where the Y50t truly shines. The Snapdragon 720G is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 665. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother gaming performance, and better overall responsiveness on the Y50t. The Y50 can handle everyday tasks, but it will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, offering excellent all-day battery life. However, the Y50t's 18W fast charging is a significant advantage over the Y50's 15W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo Y50t? Users prioritizing performance, smoother multitasking, and faster charging will appreciate the Y50t. Who should buy the vivo Y50? Those on a tighter budget who primarily need a reliable phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use might find the Y50 sufficient.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo Y50t worth the extra money?
Yes, if performance and faster charging are important to you, the Y50t is a worthwhile upgrade over the Y50. The Snapdragon 720G provides a noticeable performance boost.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones offer excellent battery life thanks to their 5000mAh batteries. However, the Y50t charges faster.
