The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y50t and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Y50t focuses on value, while the A52s 5G prioritizes performance and a more refined user experience. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Y50t’s Snapdragon 720G, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming. While the Y50t offers a lower price point, the A52s 5G’s overall package justifies the extra investment.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10, OriginOS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | V2023EA | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 190 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y50t
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life (113h endurance)
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
- Slower 18W charging
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Brighter display with higher contrast
- Faster 25W wired charging
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y50t
- Battery life is comparable, not superior
- May be slightly heavier than the Y50t
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 800 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a scenario where the Y50t’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a likely lower peak brightness. While both phones offer a 'Photo/Video' capable display, the A52s 5G’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The lack of information on the Y50t’s panel type makes it difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles compared to the A52s 5G.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the specifics are missing. However, the A52s 5G’s brand reputation and higher price point suggest a more refined camera system. While both likely feature multi-camera setups, the A52s 5G is expected to have a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The Y50t’s camera system is likely more focused on affordability, potentially sacrificing image quality and features.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is powered by the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm), a significantly more powerful processor than the vivo Y50t’s Snapdragon 720G (8 nm). The 778G features a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 2.4 GHz, alongside three additional A78 cores, offering a substantial leap in CPU performance. The 720G, with its Kryo 465 Gold and Silver cores, is geared towards efficiency but lacks the raw power for demanding tasks. The 6nm process node of the 778G also contributes to better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. This translates to a smoother, more responsive experience on the A52s 5G.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y50t and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G achieve an Endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the Y50t’s 18W charging. This means the A52s 5G can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While the mAh capacity isn't specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the A52s 5G provides a practical advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y50t if you prioritize absolute affordability and basic smartphone functionality. It’s a suitable option for users who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and light social media use. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value performance, a brighter display, and a more versatile camera system. It’s ideal for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands a responsive and feature-rich smartphone experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a capable chipset for gaming. It can handle Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps to manage heat, reducing the likelihood of significant throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G support software updates for a long period?
Samsung has a strong track record of providing software updates for its A-series devices. The A52s 5G is likely to receive at least three major Android OS updates and four years of security patches, ensuring long-term software support and security.
❓ How does the camera performance of the Y50t compare to other phones in its price range?
While specific camera tests are unavailable, the Y50t's camera is likely competitive within its price bracket, but will likely fall short of the A52s 5G. Expect decent results in good lighting conditions, but potential struggles in low-light scenarios due to the likely smaller sensor and lack of OIS.
