vivo Y50t vs Realme 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into the Snapdragon 720G Experience

Both the vivo Y50t and Realme 8 Pro represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market, both utilizing the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G chipset. However, they diverge significantly in areas like charging technology and, consequently, user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing convenience and speed, the Realme 8 Pro is the clear winner. Its 50W SuperDart charging dramatically reduces downtime compared to the vivo Y50t’s 18W charging, despite both phones sharing the same Snapdragon 720G processor and battery endurance rating.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo Y50t Realme 8 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 CDMA2000 1x 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia
Launch
Announced2021, November 162021, March 24
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, November 16Available. Released 2021, March 25
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in)160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight190 g (6.70 oz)176 g (6.21 oz)
Display
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density)
Size6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak)
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)
GPUAdreno 618Adreno 618
OSAndroid 10, OriginOSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 2.1UFS 2.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)-
Triple48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min
Type4500 mAh4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, BlueInfinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow
ModelsV2023EARMX3081
PriceAbout 190 EURAbout 550 EUR
SAR-1.10 W/kg (head)     0.53 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 116h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -28.2 LUFS (Average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 286666 (v8) GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo Y50t

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Similar Snapdragon 720G performance
  • Acceptable battery endurance

  • Significantly slower 18W charging
  • Likely less capable camera system
  • Missing detailed display specifications

Realme 8 Pro

  • Ultra-fast 50W SuperDart charging
  • Historically strong camera performance (based on Realme 8 Pro lineage)
  • Good battery endurance

  • Potentially higher price
  • Similar Snapdragon 720G performance to Y50t
  • Display specs are not detailed

Display Comparison

Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specifications like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price points, we can assume both utilize standard 60Hz panels. The Realme 8 Pro, historically, has focused on vibrant color profiles, while vivo often aims for more natural color accuracy, though this is speculative without specific data.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. The Realme 8 Pro is known for its 108MP main sensor (not present in the provided data, but a key feature), which allows for detailed images and pixel binning for improved low-light performance. The Y50t’s camera system is likely more modest. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality, but the Realme 8 Pro’s historical emphasis on camera features suggests a more capable system. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact overall camera experience.

Performance

The core performance is identical: both the vivo Y50t and Realme 8 Pro are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (SM7125) fabricated on an 8nm process. This octa-core CPU, with its 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver configuration, delivers comparable processing power for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Thermal management will likely be similar, though Realme’s larger user base and more extensive testing may reveal subtle differences in sustained performance under load. The absence of LPDDR5 or faster RAM specifications suggests both likely use LPDDR4x, limiting potential performance gains.

Battery Life

Both the vivo Y50t and Realme 8 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 116 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Realme 8 Pro’s 50W wired charging can deliver a 50% charge in just 17 minutes and a full charge in 47 minutes. In contrast, the vivo Y50t’s 18W charging will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 2 hours for a full charge. This difference in charging speed is the most significant distinction between the two devices, impacting daily usability.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo Y50t if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid choice for users who don’t mind overnight charging or infrequent top-ups. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you value rapid charging and want a phone that can quickly recover from heavy usage, making it ideal for power users and those constantly on the go.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 720G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 720G is capable of running PUBG and Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings for a smooth experience. Both phones share the same chipset, so gaming performance will be very similar. Expect medium settings to be the sweet spot for consistent frame rates.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y50t in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Realme 8 Pro can gain a significant charge during a short break – 50% in 17 minutes. The vivo Y50t will require considerably longer, potentially over an hour, to achieve the same charge level. This makes the Realme 8 Pro much more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Are there any known overheating issues with the Snapdragon 720G in either of these phones?
The Snapdragon 720G is generally known for its efficient thermal management. While prolonged gaming or intensive tasks can cause some warming, neither the vivo Y50t nor the Realme 8 Pro are typically reported to have severe overheating problems. However, sustained performance may be throttled slightly under heavy load.