vivo Y50t vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Reno 5G is the better choice. While the Snapdragon 855 is an older chip, its superior processing power and GPU capabilities outweigh the Y50t’s efficiency benefits. However, budget-conscious users will find the Y50t a capable daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y50t | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, OriginOS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | V2023EA | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 880 EUR |
vivo Y50t
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 720G chipset.
- Potentially lower price point.
- Sufficient for everyday tasks and light gaming.
- Less powerful CPU and GPU compared to the Snapdragon 855.
- Slower 18W charging.
- May struggle with demanding games and multitasking.
Oppo Reno 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 855 chipset for superior performance.
- Faster 20W charging.
- Better suited for gaming and demanding applications.
- Less power-efficient Snapdragon 855 chipset.
- Potentially higher price point.
- Older chipset may receive fewer future software updates.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Reno 5G’s positioning as a more premium device, it likely features a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and brightness. The Y50t, targeting a lower price point, likely utilizes a more cost-effective LCD panel. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting typical mid-range designs of their respective release periods.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the Reno 5G, being a higher-tier device, likely features a more capable main camera sensor with a larger aperture for improved low-light performance. The Snapdragon 855’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling better image processing and dynamic range. The Y50t’s camera system is likely adequate for casual photography, but will likely fall short in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and offers minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) boasts a significantly faster CPU clock speed (2.84 GHz peak) and a more powerful GPU compared to the vivo Y50t’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 855’s Kryo 485 cores offer a performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While the 720G’s 8nm process is more efficient, the 855’s architectural improvements and higher clock speeds translate to a noticeable performance uplift. The 720G will handle everyday tasks well, but the 855 will exhibit less lag in demanding applications and more consistent frame rates in graphically intensive games. The 7nm process of the 855 also contributes to better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The vivo Y50t’s 18W charging is slower than the Oppo Reno 5G’s 20W charging. While the difference isn’t massive, it translates to a slightly faster 0-100% charge time on the Reno 5G. The Snapdragon 720G’s efficiency could potentially offset the Reno 5G’s larger battery (assuming it has one, which is likely given its positioning), resulting in comparable real-world battery life. However, the 855’s higher power draw under load could negate this advantage during intensive use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y50t if you need a reliable, affordable 5G smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, and battery life is a top priority. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the extra processing headroom for multitasking and future software updates.