The vivo Y50t and Oppo A92 are both popular choices in the budget smartphone market, offering a blend of features and affordability. But which one truly comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their specs, performance, cameras, and battery life to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Y50t edges out the Oppo A92 thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset. While both offer decent features for the price, the Y50t's improved performance makes it the better choice for smoother multitasking and gaming, despite similar charging speeds.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Southeast Asia |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 16 | 2020, May 04. Released 2020, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 16 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10, OriginOS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens
2 MP B/W, f/2.4 |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Twilight Black, Stream White, Aurora Purple |
| Models | V2023EA | CPH2059 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo Y50t
- More powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Sleeker design
- Potentially better image processing
- Less versatile camera system (fewer lenses)
- 18W charging is slow
Oppo A92
- Versatile quad-camera system
- Familiar Oppo UI
- Good value for money
- Less powerful Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Slower performance
- 18W charging is slow
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch IPS LCD display with a Full HD+ resolution. The Oppo A92 might have slightly better color accuracy due to Oppo's display tuning, but overall, the viewing experience is comparable. Neither phone boasts a high refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A92 boasts a versatile quad-camera setup (48MP main, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, 2MP depth). The vivo Y50t has a triple-camera setup (13MP main, 2MP macro, 2MP depth). While the Oppo A92 has more lenses, the Y50t's image processing might be slightly better. Both phones offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low light.
Performance
This is where the vivo Y50t shines. The Snapdragon 720G is a noticeable upgrade over the Oppo A92's Snapdragon 665. Expect smoother app loading, better multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Y50t. The Y50t's 8nm process also contributes to slightly better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the Y50t's more efficient chipset might give it a slight edge in real-world usage. Both phones support 18W wired charging, which is relatively slow by today's standards.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y50t is ideal for users who prioritize performance and a slightly more modern design. The Oppo A92 is a good option for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded phone with a focus on camera features and a familiar Oppo user experience, especially if price is a major deciding factor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo Y50t is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset.
❓ Does the Oppo A92 have a better camera overall?
While the Y50t's image processing might be slightly better, the Oppo A92's quad-camera setup offers more versatility with its ultrawide and macro lenses.
❓ Are both phones 5G capable?
No, neither the vivo Y50t nor the Oppo A92 support 5G connectivity. They both rely on 4G LTE.
