vivo Y500 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y500 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7400, fabricated on a 4nm process, offers a significant performance advantage over the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 6nm Snapdragon 695. The 90W charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing downtime, making it ideal for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y500 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 10 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 14 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Diamond Shield Glass), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 74.5 x 7.8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.6 g (7.02 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840 PWM, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 200 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink, Gold | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2516A | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y500 Pro
- Significantly faster 90W charging
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 7400 chipset
- Potentially better gaming performance due to superior GPU
- Battery capacity is unknown
- Camera specs are not detailed
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Proven 119-hour endurance rating
- Established Xiaomi ecosystem and software support
- Potentially higher refresh rate display
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Slower 67W charging compared to vivo
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical AMOLED characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for both. Given Xiaomi’s history, the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely employs a high refresh rate panel (120Hz is common in this segment), which the Y500 Pro’s specs don’t confirm. Without further data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but a higher refresh rate would be a significant advantage for smoother scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. However, given the price bracket, it’s reasonable to assume both will feature a primary sensor around 50MP. The image processing algorithms will likely be the differentiating factor, and this is where brand preference comes into play – vivo often leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Xiaomi tends towards a more natural look. The absence of details makes it impossible to assess low-light performance or video stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y500 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) is architecturally superior to the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 4nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the Dimensity 7400 to sustain higher clock speeds for longer periods. The CPU configuration – Cortex-A78 cores in the Y500 Pro versus Kryo 660 Gold in the Poco – further favors vivo, as A78 cores generally offer better single-core performance. This will be noticeable in app launch times and overall responsiveness. The Dimensity 7400 will also provide a more substantial uplift in GPU performance, benefiting mobile gamers.
Battery Life
The Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts an endurance rating of 119 hours, a solid figure indicating good battery optimization. However, the vivo Y500 Pro’s 90W wired charging is a game-changer. While the Poco X4 Pro 5G reaches 100% in 41 minutes, the Y500 Pro’s 90W charging will likely achieve a full charge in under 35 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime, especially for users who frequently deplete their battery. The actual battery capacity of the Y500 Pro is unknown, but the faster charging speed mitigates any potential disadvantage if it’s slightly smaller than the Poco’s.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y500 Pro if you prioritize raw performance, especially for gaming and demanding applications, and value incredibly fast charging. You’ll benefit from a more future-proof chipset and a quicker overall user experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize established brand reliability, a potentially more refined software experience (depending on your preference for MIUI), and a proven battery endurance rating, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.