vivo Y500 Pro vs OnePlus Nord 2 5G: Which Mediatek-Powered Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G offers a more balanced package. Its established performance, excellent battery endurance, and reliable 65W charging provide a consistently smooth experience. While the vivo Y500 Pro’s 90W charging is tempting, the older 6nm Dimensity 1200 still holds its own and the benefits of the newer chip aren't substantial enough to outweigh the Nord 2's overall refinement.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y500 Pro | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 10 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 14 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Diamond Shield Glass), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 74.5 x 7.8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.6 g (7.02 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840 PWM, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 200 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Auto HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired Reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink, Gold | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | V2516A | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y500 Pro
- Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
- Potentially better power efficiency with 4nm Dimensity 7400
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Dimensity 7400 may not outperform the Dimensity 1200 in all scenarios
- Battery life is unknown and could be lower than the Nord 2 5G
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- Proven 102-hour battery endurance
- Powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset with high-clocked cores
- Reliable 65W charging with PD support
- Charging speed is slower than the vivo Y500 Pro
- 6nm process is less power efficient than 4nm
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G features a display capable of reaching 633 nits of peak brightness, ensuring good visibility even outdoors. While the Y500 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to expect similar performance given its market positioning. Both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors and deep blacks, with the Nord 2 5G advertising an infinite contrast ratio. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management, potentially impacting battery life during dynamic content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will likely feature a primary sensor around 64MP, accompanied by ultrawide and macro lenses. The usefulness of a 2MP macro lens on either device is questionable, offering limited detail and dynamic range. Image processing will be a key differentiator, with OnePlus typically favoring a more natural look while vivo often boosts saturation.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm) features a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core and three additional Cortex-A78 cores, alongside four Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The vivo Y500 Pro’s Dimensity 7400 (4nm) utilizes a 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7400 *should* offer improved power efficiency, but the Nord 2 5G’s higher clocked primary core and additional high-performance cores provide a performance advantage in demanding tasks. Both devices benefit from ample RAM, though specific LPDDR versions aren't specified, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts an impressive 102-hour endurance rating, indicating excellent battery life under typical usage. While the Y500 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 90W wired charging is a significant advantage, potentially allowing for a full charge in under 40 minutes. The Nord 2 5G’s 65W charging with PD support takes approximately 30 minutes for a full charge. The faster charging of the Y500 Pro is ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, but the Nord 2 5G’s longer endurance reduces the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y500 Pro if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and are willing to potentially trade off some established software optimization for a newer chipset. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G if you value a well-rounded experience with proven battery life, reliable performance, and a refined user interface. The Nord 2 5G is ideal for users who want a dependable daily driver.