vivo Y500 Pro vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and fast charging, the vivo Y500 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7400 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Snapdragon 695 in the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and the 90W charging is substantially faster than the Edge 30 Neo’s 68W capability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y500 Pro | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 10 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 14 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Diamond Shield Glass), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 74.5 x 7.8 mm (6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.6 g (7.02 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Diamond Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840 PWM, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 200 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 0.5µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired Reverse wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink, Gold | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | V2516A | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y500 Pro
- Significantly faster 90W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 7400 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Bright 1004 nit display
- Good battery endurance (104h rating)
- Wireless charging support
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Slower 68W charging
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a bright display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo Y500 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 30 Neo’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a good quality panel. However, without knowing the panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED) or refresh rate of the Y500 Pro, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The Edge 30 Neo’s brightness is a clear advantage based on available data.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for both. Without knowing sensor sizes, aperture values, or the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the Edge 30 Neo might prioritize image processing and software features, while the Y500 Pro may focus on hardware capabilities. The absence of specific details makes it impossible to determine a clear winner in this category.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y500 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) is built on a more advanced fabrication process than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). This 4nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the Dimensity 7400 to sustain higher clock speeds for longer periods. The Dimensity 7400’s CPU configuration – Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) – also offers a performance advantage over the Snapdragon 695’s Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). This means the Y500 Pro will likely excel in multitasking, demanding games, and overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The vivo Y500 Pro supports 90W wired charging, significantly faster than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging. The Y500 Pro also adds 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Edge 30 Neo. This means the Y500 Pro can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Y500 Pro is a substantial advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y500 Pro if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prioritize a more balanced experience with good battery endurance, a bright display, and a potentially more polished software experience, accepting a trade-off in raw processing power.