The vivo Y50 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this through different approaches, primarily centered around their respective Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device offers the best balance of performance, features, and price.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset, built on a more efficient 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the vivo Y50’s Snapdragon 665, especially in demanding tasks. The slightly faster 18W charging is a welcome bonus, making it a more future-proof option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06 | 2021, October 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April 12 | Available. Released 2021, October 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.38 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 165.8 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, MIUI 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 48 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Iris Blue, Iris Blue, Pearl White | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Black, Champagne Gold |
| Models | 1935, V1965A | M2002F4LG |
| Price | ₹ 18,000 | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.01 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y50
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset for basic tasks
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Less powerful Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Slower 15W charging
- May struggle with demanding apps and games
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite
- More powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Faster 18W charging
- Improved power efficiency for longer battery life
- May be slightly more expensive
- Performance gains may not be noticeable for very basic users
- Software experience can vary based on MIUI version
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the focus here is on the underlying processing power impacting UI smoothness. The difference in display quality is likely minimal, making the chipset the more significant differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 720G’s integrated Image Signal Processor (ISP) is more advanced than the 665’s, offering improved image processing capabilities. This translates to potentially better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality on the Redmi Note 10 Lite, even with similar sensor configurations. The presence of a more capable ISP is more impactful than minor sensor differences in this price bracket.
Performance
The core distinction lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm) is a clear upgrade over the vivo Y50’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 8nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance during prolonged use. The 720G’s CPU configuration – 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver – also provides a frequency advantage over the Y50’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver. This means faster app loading times and a more fluid user experience on the Redmi Note 10 Lite.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature similar battery capacities, typical for this segment. However, the Redmi Note 10 Lite’s 18W wired charging is faster than the Y50’s 15W charging. While not a massive difference, the 18W charging will reduce the time spent tethered to a wall outlet, offering a more convenient user experience. The Snapdragon 720G’s improved efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y50 if your primary needs are basic smartphone functionality – calls, texts, social media – and you prioritize a potentially lower price point. It’s a suitable option for first-time smartphone users or those on a very tight budget. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite if you value smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and faster charging. The Snapdragon 720G offers a more responsive experience and better long-term usability for users who demand more from their device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 10 Lite handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 720G is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it provides a significantly smoother experience than the Snapdragon 665 in the vivo Y50, which may struggle with consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Redmi Note 10 Lite compared to the vivo Y50 in real-world use?
The 18W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Lite will likely shave off around 30-60 minutes of charging time compared to the vivo Y50’s 15W charging, assuming similar battery capacities. This means a full charge could take approximately 2-2.5 hours on the Redmi Note 10 Lite versus 2.5-3 hours on the Y50.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 720G a significant upgrade for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, even for everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 720G offers a noticeable improvement in responsiveness. App launch times will be quicker, multitasking will be smoother, and the overall user experience will feel more fluid compared to the Snapdragon 665.
