The vivo Y50 and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Y50 aims for affordability, while the A52s 5G prioritizes performance and 5G connectivity. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Y50’s Snapdragon 665, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a better gaming experience. While both offer similar battery endurance, the A52s 5G’s faster 25W charging is a significant advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April 12 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.38 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Iris Blue, Iris Blue, Pearl White | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | 1935, V1965A | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | ₹ 18,000 | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y50
- More affordable price point
- Acceptable battery life
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker performance
- Lower quality display
- Slower charging speed
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Much faster performance with Snapdragon 778G
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster 25W charging
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y50
- May be slightly heavier
- Potentially more expensive repairs
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly more impressive display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits compared to the Y50’s unspecified brightness. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the A52s 5G’s superior panel technology likely delivers more accurate colors and wider viewing angles. The Y50’s display specifications are minimal, suggesting a lower-quality panel overall.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for the Y50. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise and potentially a larger sensor, though specific details are unavailable. The Y50’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. Without sensor size or aperture information for the Y50, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison beyond assuming the A52s 5G offers a more versatile and capable camera experience.
Performance
The core difference between these phones lies in their chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y50’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – compared to the Y50’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver configuration. This translates to a noticeable performance difference in demanding tasks and gaming. The 6nm process node of the 778G also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y50 and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Y50’s 15W charging. This means the A52s 5G can be topped up much faster, reducing downtime. While both phones offer comparable battery endurance, the faster charging speed of the A52s 5G provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y50 if you need a basic smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prioritize performance, 5G connectivity, a brighter and more vibrant display, and faster charging – even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 778G in the Galaxy A52s 5G capable of handling demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a very capable chipset for gaming. It can comfortably run PUBG and Genshin Impact at high settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps to manage heat, reducing the risk of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G supports carrier aggregation, which allows the phone to combine multiple 5G channels for significantly faster download and upload speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This is a key advantage for users in areas with strong 5G coverage.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the vivo Y50 with its 15W charger?
With its 15W charging, the vivo Y50 will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. This is considerably slower than the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s 25W charging.
❓ Is the camera on the vivo Y50 sufficient for casual social media photos?
The vivo Y50’s camera is likely adequate for casual social media photos in good lighting conditions. However, it will likely struggle in low-light environments and lack the advanced features and image quality of the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G.
