vivo Y50 vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing affordability, the vivo Y50 offers a functional experience. However, the Oppo Reno 5G is the clear winner, delivering a substantially faster and more responsive experience thanks to its Snapdragon 855. The Reno 5G’s faster charging and superior processing power justify the price difference for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y50 | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April 12 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.38 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Iris Blue, Iris Blue, Pearl White | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | 1935, V1965A | CPH1921 |
| Price | ₹ 18,000 | About 880 EUR |
vivo Y50
- Significantly more affordable
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Functional and reliable
- Outmatched by the Reno 5G in performance
- Slower charging speed
- Likely lower-quality display
Oppo Reno 5G
- Much faster Snapdragon 855 processor
- Faster 20W charging
- Potentially superior display and camera
- Higher price point
- May offer diminishing returns for basic users
- Potentially larger and heavier
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Y50's positioning, it likely features an LCD panel, while the Reno 5G, being a higher-tier device, may incorporate an AMOLED display for richer colors and deeper blacks. The Reno 5G's higher price point suggests a potentially higher peak brightness and more refined color calibration, enhancing outdoor visibility and media consumption. Bezels are likely to be slimmer on the Reno 5G, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, we can only infer. The Reno 5G, as a more expensive device, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. While both phones likely offer standard camera features, the Snapdragon 855’s image signal processor (ISP) in the Reno 5G provides superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Y50 will likely rely more on software processing to compensate for a potentially smaller sensor, which can introduce artifacts and noise. The Reno 5G is expected to offer better dynamic range and more accurate color reproduction.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y50’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm) is a capable processor for everyday tasks, but it’s significantly outmatched by the Oppo Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm). The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 855 is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The 855’s Kryo 485 CPU architecture, with its 1x2.84 GHz prime core, offers a substantial performance boost over the Y50’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Reno 5G. The Reno 5G will handle graphically intensive games with higher frame rates and detail settings.
Battery Life
The vivo Y50 features 15W wired charging, while the Oppo Reno 5G supports 20W wired charging. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Reno 5G’s faster charging will significantly reduce the time spent tethered to a wall outlet. A 5W difference may not seem large, but it can translate to a 30-60 minute faster full charge. The more efficient Snapdragon 855 in the Reno 5G may also contribute to better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Y50, as it consumes less power during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y50 if you need a reliable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing, and your budget is a primary concern. You'll appreciate its simplicity and affordability. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and you're willing to spend more for a smoother, faster, and more future-proof experience. The Reno 5G is ideal for users who want a device that can keep up with their fast-paced lifestyle.