The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y50, powered by the Snapdragon 665, represents a reliable, established option. However, the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC enters the fray with a more modern Mediatek Helio G95 chipset and a substantial charging advantage, forcing a direct comparison for budget-conscious buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC is the superior choice. Its Helio G95 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Snapdragon 665 in the vivo Y50, and the 33W fast charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the Y50 offers a familiar experience, the Infinix provides better value for the money.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06 | 2021, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April 12 | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.38 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Iris Blue, Iris Blue, Pearl White | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret |
| Models | 1935, V1965A | X695C |
| Price | ₹ 18,000 | - |
vivo Y50
- Reliable Qualcomm chipset
- Established brand reputation
- Simple and user-friendly interface
- Slow 15W charging
- Less powerful chipset for gaming
- Potentially outdated software
Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC
- Faster Helio G95 chipset
- 33W fast charging
- NFC support for contactless payments
- Mediatek chipset may have less software support
- Infinix brand less well-known in some markets
- Potential for more aggressive bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood: processing power impacts UI smoothness. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the Infinix’s more powerful chipset will contribute to a more responsive experience when scrolling and navigating the interface. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the budget nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC likely features a more sophisticated camera system. While both phones likely include a standard, multi-camera setup, the G95’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The presence of NFC in the Infinix model suggests a slightly more feature-rich overall package, potentially extending to camera features. We can assume both will include a standard macro lens, but its utility is limited in both cases.
Performance
The core difference here is the chipset. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm) is a clear upgrade over the vivo Y50’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The G95 features more powerful Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.05 GHz) compared to the Kryo 260 Gold cores (4x2.0 GHz) in the Snapdragon 665. This translates to better performance in demanding applications and games. The 12nm process node on the G95 also generally offers better power efficiency than the 11nm node of the Snapdragon 665, though real-world results depend on software optimization. The G95’s GPU will also provide a more enjoyable gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s 33W wired charging is a game-changer. The vivo Y50’s 15W charging feels slow by comparison. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Infinix significantly reduces the time spent tethered to a wall outlet. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently use their phones for gaming or streaming, activities that quickly drain the battery. The Infinix’s more efficient chipset also contributes to potentially longer battery life, even with similar capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y50 if you prioritize a known brand with a conservative approach to performance and a simple user experience. It’s ideal for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC if you want a more capable device for gaming, multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster charging – a boon for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G95 is known to run warmer than some other chipsets, particularly under sustained load. However, Infinix likely implements thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating. While some throttling is possible during prolonged gaming, the G95’s performance advantage still makes it a better choice for gamers than the Snapdragon 665.
❓ Is the NFC functionality on the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC compatible with all payment systems?
The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC supports standard NFC protocols and should be compatible with most contactless payment systems, including Google Pay and various bank-specific mobile payment apps. However, compatibility can vary depending on your region and bank. It's best to check with your financial institution to confirm support.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the vivo Y50 and the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC?
The vivo Y50 typically runs Funtouch OS, known for its customization options and sometimes pre-installed bloatware. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC runs XOS, which also includes customization features and pre-installed apps. XOS is generally considered more aggressive with its app recommendations and notifications, while Funtouch OS can feel more polished. Both offer a similar Android experience at their core.
