The vivo Y50 (China) and Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at accessible price points, they diverge significantly in their core hardware – specifically, their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 768G, built on a 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge over the vivo Y50’s Dimensity 6300. However, the Y50’s faster 44W charging is a significant advantage for those who value quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 21 | 2020, May 11. Released 2020, May 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 21 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 165.3 x 76.6 x 8.8 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 570 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM768 Snapdragon 768G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 10, MIUI 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1
|
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm, depth sensor |
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 30W wired, 100% in 57 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Platinum, Azure, Diamond Black | Mint, Blue, Red, Purple, White |
| Models | V2443A, V2443BA | - |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y50 (China)
- Faster 44W wired charging for quicker top-ups.
- Potentially better power efficiency due to the 6nm Dimensity 6300.
- Competitive price point within the mid-range segment.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Snapdragon 768G.
- Likely less capable gaming performance.
- Camera system likely less advanced than the Redmi K30 5G Racing.
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing
- More powerful Snapdragon 768G chipset for superior performance.
- Likely better gaming experience due to the more capable GPU.
- Potentially more advanced camera system with a larger sensor.
- Slower 30W charging compared to the vivo Y50.
- Potentially higher power consumption.
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo Y50.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi K30 5G Racing’s positioning, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel (120Hz was common in this series) offering smoother scrolling and animations compared to the Y50, which likely sticks to a standard 60Hz panel. The Redmi K30 5G Racing likely has a slightly larger display, typical of Xiaomi’s design language. Color accuracy and peak brightness will be key differentiators, but without data, we can only speculate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, given the Redmi K30 5G Racing’s market positioning, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The vivo Y50 likely focuses on computational photography to enhance image quality, but may lack the hardware advantages of the Redmi. The presence or absence of features like 4K video recording and advanced night modes will be crucial differentiators.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing’s Snapdragon 768G (7nm) boasts a Kryo 475 Prime core clocked at 2.8GHz, offering a significant single-core performance advantage over the vivo Y50’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm). While the Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores are capable, the Snapdragon 768G’s architecture and higher clock speeds translate to smoother multitasking and superior gaming performance. The 7nm process of the Snapdragon also generally leads to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Dimensity 6300’s 6nm process is more efficient, but the architectural differences favor the Snapdragon in raw power.
Battery Life
The Redmi K30 5G Racing’s 30W charging, achieving 100% in 57 minutes, is respectable, but the vivo Y50’s 44W charging offers a clear advantage in terms of speed. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Y50 means less time tethered to a wall outlet. The efficiency of the respective chipsets will also play a role in overall battery life; the Snapdragon 768G’s higher performance may consume more power, potentially offsetting some of the benefit of a larger battery (if present).
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y50 (China) if you need consistently fast charging and prioritize a balance between everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Its 44W charging will minimize downtime. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing if you prefer a more powerful processor for demanding games and applications, and are willing to trade some charging speed for that performance boost. The Snapdragon 768G offers a more future-proof experience for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 768G in the Redmi K30 5G Racing handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
The Snapdragon 768G is capable of running Genshin Impact, but expect to make some compromises on graphics settings. You’ll likely need to target medium settings for a consistently smooth experience, especially during intense combat scenarios. The Dimensity 6300 in the vivo Y50 will struggle to maintain playable frame rates at similar settings.
❓ How much faster is the 44W charging on the vivo Y50 compared to the 30W charging on the Redmi K30 5G Racing in real-world use?
The vivo Y50’s 44W charging will noticeably reduce charging time. While the Redmi K30 5G Racing takes 57 minutes to reach 100%, the Y50 should be able to achieve a full charge in approximately 45-50 minutes, depending on battery capacity. This difference is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their phone.
❓ Does the Redmi K30 5G Racing support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
The Redmi K30 5G Racing does support carrier aggregation, a crucial feature for maximizing 5G speeds in areas with network congestion. This allows the phone to combine multiple frequency bands for a more stable and faster connection. The vivo Y50’s 5G capabilities are less well-documented, but it likely supports a more limited range of 5G bands.
