The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y400 and Realme 11 Pro+ represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Y400 leverages Qualcomm's latest 4-series chipset for efficiency, while the 11 Pro+ aims for a performance edge with MediaTek's Dimensity 7050. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term efficiency and a smooth daily experience, the vivo Y400 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, offers excellent power management. However, the Realme 11 Pro+ appeals to users who demand more raw processing power for demanding tasks and faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 04 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 07 | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 50% in 20 min
Reverse wired
Bypass Charging | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glam White, Olive Green | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | - | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | ₹ 22,999 | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.80 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y400
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- 90W fast charging with 50% in 20 minutes
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially lower peak performance compared to Dimensity 7050
- Unknown display brightness and camera specifications
Realme 11 Pro+
- Faster 100W wired charging
- Higher peak display brightness (793 nits)
- Potentially superior camera performance (200MP sensor - external knowledge)
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Potentially shorter battery life due to higher power consumption
Display Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 793 nits, a significant advantage over the unstated brightness of the Y400. While the Y400’s panel specifications are missing, Realme’s higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. Both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket, but the 11 Pro+’s brightness gives it a clear edge for media consumption in bright environments. We expect both to have FHD+ resolutions, but the 11 Pro+'s brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited for both devices. The Realme 11 Pro+ is known for its 200MP main sensor (not mentioned in the provided data, but a key feature), which allows for detailed images and significant cropping potential. The Y400’s camera setup is unknown, but given its price point, it likely features a more modest sensor. Without further information, it’s difficult to compare image quality directly, but the 11 Pro+’s higher resolution sensor gives it a significant advantage in terms of potential detail capture. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the 11 Pro+'s sensor size and processing capabilities will likely result in superior image quality.
Performance
The Realme 11 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) and its 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores offer a theoretical performance advantage over the vivo Y400’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm). The Dimensity 7050’s higher clock speeds will result in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. However, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm fabrication process is more efficient, potentially leading to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Y400’s architecture, while slower on paper, could provide a more consistent experience over time. The 11 Pro+ will likely excel in benchmarks, but real-world sustained performance is where the 4nm process of the Y400 could shine.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro+ boasts 100W wired charging, while the vivo Y400 supports 90W. This translates to slightly faster charging speeds for the 11 Pro+, though both are exceptionally quick. The Y400 can reach 50% charge in 20 minutes, and the 11 Pro+ will likely be marginally faster. The Realme 11 Pro+ had an endurance rating of 112h, suggesting a larger battery capacity. However, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s efficiency in the Y400 could offset the 11 Pro+'s larger battery, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The Y400 also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the provided data for the 11 Pro+.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y400 if you need a phone that prioritizes battery life, consistent performance for everyday tasks, and efficient thermal management. It’s ideal for students, commuters, and users who aren’t heavy gamers. Buy the Realme 11 Pro+ if you prefer a phone with a more powerful processor for gaming and multitasking, and if you value the convenience of slightly faster 100W charging, even at the cost of potentially reduced battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7050 in the Realme 11 Pro+ overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7050 is a capable processor, its 6nm fabrication process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm process. This means the 11 Pro+ may experience more thermal throttling during extended gaming, potentially leading to reduced performance over time. However, Realme likely incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate this issue.
❓ How does the 90W charging on the vivo Y400 compare to the 100W charging on the Realme 11 Pro+ in real-world use?
Both charging speeds are exceptionally fast. While the 11 Pro+’s 100W charging is slightly faster on paper, the difference in real-world charging times will likely be minimal. The Y400 can already reach 50% charge in 20 minutes, and the 11 Pro+ will only shave off a few minutes from that time. The convenience of extremely fast charging is present on both devices.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y400 powerful enough for demanding apps and multitasking?
The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is designed for smooth performance in everyday tasks and moderate multitasking. While it won’t match the raw power of the Dimensity 7050, it’s more than capable of handling social media, web browsing, and most popular apps. For users who primarily use their phone for these activities, the Y400 will provide a responsive and enjoyable experience.
