vivo Y400 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly newer processor, the vivo Y400 is the better choice. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo wins for those who value extended battery life and a brighter, more visible screen in outdoor conditions. The Edge 40 Neo’s endurance is a significant advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y400 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 04 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 07 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 50% in 20 min Reverse wired Bypass Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glam White, Olive Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 22,999 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.80 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y400
- 90W Super-Fast Charging
- Newer Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 Chipset (4nm)
- Reverse Wired Charging & Bypass Charging
- Battery life likely shorter than Edge 40 Neo
- Display brightness not specified, potentially lower
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent Battery Life (10:28h active use)
- Bright 1073 nit Display
- Efficient Dimensity 7030 Chipset
- Slower 68W Charging
- Older Chipset Architecture compared to Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the vivo Y400, whose peak brightness isn't specified. While the Y400’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness suggests a superior viewing experience in challenging lighting conditions. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and without color accuracy data, it’s difficult to assess which phone offers more accurate color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of sensor size and aperture information for both devices. Both phones are advertised as having photo/video capabilities, but without specifics, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Y400 is unlikely to significantly impact the overall camera experience, serving primarily as a marketing feature. The Edge 40 Neo’s camera system likely benefits from Motorola’s image processing algorithms, but a direct comparison requires detailed sample images and testing.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) and the vivo Y400’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) represent different approaches to mid-range performance. The Dimensity 7030 features slightly higher clocked Cortex-A78 cores (2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz), potentially offering a small edge in single-core tasks. However, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm process node provides superior power efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance and thermal management. Both utilize the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, but the 4nm node gives the Y400 an advantage in long-term stability. The Y400’s newer architecture may also benefit from software optimizations down the line.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an 80-hour endurance rating. While the vivo Y400’s battery capacity is not specified, its 90W wired charging is a major draw, promising a 50% charge in just 20 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging takes 15 minutes to reach 50%, a respectable time but slower than the Y400. The Y400 also offers reverse wired charging and bypass charging, features absent on the Edge 40 Neo, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y400 if you frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly and appreciate the benefits of a more recent chipset architecture for sustained performance. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, often use your phone outdoors, and prefer a display that remains easily visible under direct sunlight. The Edge 40 Neo is ideal for heavy users who don't want to worry about constant charging.