The smartphone landscape is littered with compelling mid-range options, but choosing the right one can be daunting. We pit the recently released vivo Y400 Pro, powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 7300, against the established Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G, featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865. This comparison isn't about raw specs; it's about understanding which phone delivers the best experience for *your* needs, considering the Mi 10T Pro's age and current pricing.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y400 Pro emerges as the better buy. Its newer Dimensity 7300 chipset offers comparable performance to the Snapdragon 865, coupled with significantly faster 90W charging. While the Mi 10T Pro boasts excellent battery endurance, the Y400 Pro’s speed and modern features justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 20 | 2020, September 30. Released 2020, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.0 x 7.5 or 7.7 mm | 165.1 x 76.4 x 9.3 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR, 1300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 50% in 19 min
6W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fest Gold, Freestyle White, Nebula Purple | Cosmic Black, Lunar Silver, Aurora Blue |
| Models | - | M2007J3SG, M2007J3SP, M2007J3SI, M2007J17C |
| Price | ₹ 24,999 | € 141.52 / £ 169.99 |
| SAR | 0.90 W/kg (head) | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.85 W/kg (head) | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 385.00 |
| 256GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 415.00 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 564.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1185:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 563961 (v8)
GeekBench: 3311 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y400 Pro
- Faster 90W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- More modern Dimensity 7300 chipset offers better efficiency.
- Potential for longer software support due to newer release.
- Battery capacity is unspecified, potentially smaller than the Mi 10T Pro.
- Camera specifications are vague, making it hard to assess image quality.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
- Exceptional battery endurance with 118-hour rating.
- Available at competitive prices ($385-$415 for 8GB/128GB or 256GB).
- Proven Snapdragon 865 performance, still capable for most tasks.
- Slower 33W charging.
- Older chipset may receive fewer software updates.
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load.
Display Comparison
Both phones share a contrast ratio of 1185:1, suggesting similar image quality in terms of black levels. However, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro’s measured peak brightness of 630 nits is a known quantity, while the vivo Y400 Pro’s brightness remains unspecified. Given the Y400 Pro’s newer design, it’s reasonable to expect comparable or slightly improved brightness. Neither phone’s specifications mention high refresh rate displays, meaning smooth scrolling and animations are not a key feature of either device.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the age of the Mi 10T Pro suggests its image processing algorithms are less refined than those found in the newer vivo Y400 Pro. It’s likely the Y400 Pro will deliver better dynamic range and low-light performance, even with similar hardware. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout camera performer.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) was a flagship processor in its time, featuring a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core. The vivo Y400 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 (4nm) utilizes a more modern architecture with 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 provides superior power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially more sustained performance under load. While the Snapdragon 865 still holds its own, the Dimensity 7300 offers a more balanced and future-proofed experience, especially considering the Mi 10T Pro's age.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 118 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the vivo Y400 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 90W wired, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes, compared to the Mi 10T Pro’s 33W wired charging with PD3.0. While the Mi 10T Pro excels in longevity, the Y400 Pro minimizes downtime with its rapid charging capabilities. The Y400 Pro also offers 6W reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Mi 10T Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y400 Pro if you prioritize fast charging, a more modern chipset with potential for longer software support, and a generally smoother user experience. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G if you absolutely need maximum battery life and can find it at a substantial discount, accepting that it's running on older hardware and may have limited future updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7300 in the vivo Y400 Pro handle demanding games like Genshin Impact or PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 7300 is a capable chipset that should handle Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings. The 4nm process node and efficient core design contribute to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of significant frame drops during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 865 in the Mi 10T Pro.
❓ How much faster is the 90W charging on the vivo Y400 Pro compared to the 33W charging on the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro in real-world use?
The 90W charging on the Y400 Pro is a game-changer. While the Mi 10T Pro's 33W charging is adequate, the Y400 Pro can reach 50% charge in just 19 minutes. A full charge will take significantly less time, minimizing downtime and making it ideal for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Given the Mi 10T Pro is an older model, how long can I expect software updates and security patches to continue?
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is nearing the end of its software support lifecycle. While it has received updates in the past, future updates are less certain. The vivo Y400 Pro, being a newer device, will likely receive more frequent updates and security patches for a longer period, ensuring a more secure and feature-rich experience.
