The smartphone landscape is crowded with options, and choosing between a newer mid-range device like the vivo Y400 Pro and a slightly older, but still capable, 'flagship killer' like the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 can be tricky. This comparison dives deep into the core specifications and real-world implications of each phone, focusing on performance, charging, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and potentially longer software support, the vivo Y400 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 90W charging significantly outperforms the S20 FE's 25W, and the Dimensity 7300 offers competitive performance. However, the S20 FE's established brand recognition and potentially better camera image processing remain strong considerations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat19 1800/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 20 | 2022, April 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 27 | Available. Released 2022, April 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.0 x 7.5 or 7.7 mm | 159.8 x 74.5 x 8.4 mm (6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR, 1300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 32-bit/384kHz audio
Tuned by AKG |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing
Bixby natural language commands and dictation
Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 50% in 19 min
6W reverse wired | 25W wired, PD3.0
15W wireless (Qi)
4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fest Gold, Freestyle White, Nebula Purple | Cloud White, Cloud Lavender, Cloud Navy |
| Models | - | SM-G781NK, SM-G781NK22 |
| Price | ₹ 24,999 | About 520 EUR |
| SAR | 0.90 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.85 W/kg (head) | - |
vivo Y400 Pro
- Significantly faster 90W charging
- More modern and efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Potentially longer software support due to newer hardware
- Less established brand reputation
- Likely inferior display technology compared to the S20 FE
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022
- Well-regarded camera image processing
- 120Hz AMOLED display (assumed)
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Older Snapdragon 865 chipset with potential for throttling
- May be nearing end of software update cycle
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, the Galaxy S20 FE 2022 is known for its 120Hz AMOLED display, a significant advantage over what is typically found in the Y400 Pro's price bracket. The S20 FE's higher refresh rate translates to smoother scrolling and animations. The Y400 Pro likely utilizes an LCD panel, which, while adequate, won't match the contrast and vibrancy of the S20 FE's AMOLED. Bezels are likely comparable, but the S20 FE benefits from Samsung's display expertise.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Samsung's image processing is generally highly regarded, and the S20 FE likely benefits from more sophisticated algorithms. The Snapdragon 865's ISP is also a capable performer. The Y400 Pro will rely on Mediatek's image signal processing capabilities, which have improved significantly, but may not yet reach Samsung's level. Sensor size and aperture are crucial, and without that data, we can only speculate. The S20 FE likely has a more versatile camera system overall.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y400 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) boasts a newer architecture and fabrication process compared to the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022's Snapdragon 865 (7nm+). The 4nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While the Snapdragon 865's Cortex-A77 prime core has a higher clock speed (2.84 GHz vs 2.5 GHz), the Dimensity 7300's newer architecture and more efficient process can close the gap, and potentially surpass it in multi-core tasks. The Y400 Pro's CPU configuration (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is a modern arrangement, while the S20 FE's (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) is a slightly older design. Both phones likely feature ample RAM for smooth multitasking, but the Y400 Pro may benefit from newer LPDDR5x RAM standards.
Battery Life
The charging speed is a clear win for the vivo Y400 Pro. 90W wired charging can replenish the battery from 0-50% in just 19 minutes, a massive advantage over the S20 FE's 25W charging. While the S20 FE offers 15W wireless charging (Qi), the Y400 Pro only offers 6W reverse wired charging. Battery capacity isn't specified, but the faster charging of the Y400 Pro mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The S20 FE's PD3.0 support is a nice-to-have, but the sheer speed of 90W charging is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y400 Pro if you need blazing-fast charging, a modern chipset with good efficiency, and are comfortable with a less established brand. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 if you prioritize a well-known brand, a potentially more refined camera experience, and wireless charging capabilities, even at the cost of slower wired charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 865 in the Galaxy S20 FE 2022 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 865 is known to throttle under sustained load, especially in less optimally cooled devices. While the S20 FE has some thermal management, demanding games may lead to performance drops after prolonged play. The Dimensity 7300's 4nm process in the Y400 Pro should offer better thermal efficiency, potentially resulting in more consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the 90W charging on the vivo Y400 Pro compared to the 25W charging on the S20 FE in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Y400 Pro can add around 50% charge in 19 minutes, while the S20 FE will take well over an hour to reach the same level. This means you can quickly top up the Y400 Pro during short breaks, whereas the S20 FE requires a much longer charging commitment.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022 still receive software updates?
Samsung typically provides several years of software support for its flagship and 'FE' devices. However, as the S20 FE 2022 is an older model, it may be nearing the end of its major Android update cycle. The vivo Y400 Pro, being a newer device, is likely to receive updates for a longer period.
