vivo Y400 Pro vs Motorola Edge+ (2023): A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a premium experience, the Motorola Edge+ (2023) is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage. However, the vivo Y400 Pro offers exceptional value, delivering strong performance and incredibly fast 90W charging at a significantly lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y400 Pro | Motorola Edge+ (2023) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 41, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 20 | 2023, May 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 27 | Available. Released 2023, May 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.0 x 7.5 or 7.7 mm | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR, 1300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 512GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, 50% in 19 min 6W reverse wired | 68W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fest Gold, Freestyle White, Nebula Purple | Interstellar Black |
| Price | ₹ 24,999 | $ 298.99 |
| SAR | 0.90 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.85 W/kg (head) | - |
vivo Y400 Pro
- Incredibly fast 90W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Capable Dimensity 7300 processor for everyday use
- Likely inferior camera system compared to the Edge+
- Less powerful processor than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Motorola Edge+ (2023)
- Top-tier performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Likely superior camera quality
- Higher price tag
- Slower wired charging than the Y400 Pro
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided for the Y400 Pro, Motorola's Edge+ (2023) likely features a high-refresh-rate OLED panel, typical of flagship devices. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s integrated display engine supports advanced features like variable refresh rate (VRR) for smoother scrolling and gaming. The Y400 Pro’s display quality will likely be good for its price bracket, but will likely lack the peak brightness and color accuracy of the Edge+’s panel. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both devices, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Y400 Pro are absent, making a direct comparison difficult. However, Motorola typically equips its Edge+ models with high-resolution main sensors and optical image stabilization (OIS). The Edge+ (2023) likely features a large sensor with a wide aperture for excellent low-light performance. Image processing is a key differentiator; Motorola’s software aims for natural-looking images, while vivo often employs more vibrant and saturated processing. Without knowing the Y400 Pro’s sensor size and OIS capabilities, it’s difficult to assess its camera performance, but it’s unlikely to match the Edge+’s flagship-level imaging.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) in the Motorola Edge+ (2023) boasts a significantly more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, paired with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 and 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 cores, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the vivo Y400 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 (4nm) which uses 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture, particularly the Cortex-X3, provides a substantial uplift in single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The Edge+ also benefits from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance. While the Dimensity 7300 is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a more robust and future-proof experience, especially for graphically intensive tasks. Thermal management will be key; the 4nm process on both chips is efficient, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s higher performance ceiling may require more aggressive cooling.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge+ (2023) offers 68W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging. The vivo Y400 Pro, however, takes the lead with its 90W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes. While the Edge+’s wireless charging is a convenience, the Y400 Pro’s significantly faster wired charging is a major advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the Y400 Pro’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y400 Pro if you need blazing-fast charging speeds, a solid mid-range processor for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and are budget-conscious. Buy the Motorola Edge+ (2023) if you demand the absolute best performance for demanding games and applications, appreciate wireless charging, and are willing to pay a premium for a top-tier flagship experience.