The vivo Y400 4G and Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$300 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take fundamentally different approaches to achieving that goal – the Y400 prioritizes a proven, efficient chipset, while the Camon 20 Pro 5G leaps into 5G connectivity with a more powerful, but potentially power-hungry, processor. This comparison dissects these choices to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and efficient battery life, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8050 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Snapdragon 685 in the vivo Y400 4G, justifying the slightly slower charging speed and potentially higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 28 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 28 | Available. Released 2023, May 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 162.7 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g or 198 g (6.91 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, HIOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple Twilight, Tropical Green (Dynamic Green), Pearl White | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue |
| Models | I2502 | CK8n |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 270 EUR |
vivo Y400 4G
- Faster 44W charging
- Potentially better battery life due to efficient chipset
- Reliable Snapdragon 685 performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful processor compared to Dimensity 8050
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster Dimensity 8050 processor
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Likely superior camera system
- Slower 33W charging
- Potentially shorter battery life due to more powerful processor
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price bracket, we can anticipate both utilizing LCD panels. The Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G, being positioned as a slightly more premium device, may benefit from a higher peak brightness and potentially a slightly more refined color calibration. The absence of information regarding refresh rates is notable; a 90Hz panel on the Tecno would be a significant advantage for smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G, as the 'Pro' model, likely features a more sophisticated camera system. We can infer that it may have a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), which would improve low-light performance and reduce blur. The vivo Y400 4G will likely focus on providing a functional camera experience, but may lack the advanced features found on the Tecno. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 8050, built on a 6nm process, boasts a significantly more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the vivo Y400 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, featuring 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Dimensity 8050’s architecture, with its higher-clocked and more efficient Cortex-A78 cores, translates to substantially faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 8050’s superior core design provides a clear performance advantage, particularly in CPU-intensive tasks. The 5G modem in the Tecno also offers future-proofing, though real-world 5G availability varies.
Battery Life
The vivo Y400 4G’s 44W wired charging is faster than the Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G’s 33W wired charging. This means the Y400 will likely achieve a 0-100% charge in a shorter timeframe. However, the Dimensity 8050 in the Tecno is likely to consume more power than the Snapdragon 685. Therefore, while the Y400 charges faster, the Tecno’s more efficient chipset may offset some of the charging speed difference in real-world usage, especially for users who don't heavily utilize the phone. Battery capacity is not specified, making a definitive statement on endurance impossible, but the chipset efficiency will be a key factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y400 4G if you need a reliable daily driver with excellent battery optimization and are less concerned with 5G connectivity or demanding gaming. Buy the Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G if you prioritize faster processing speeds for multitasking, streaming, and gaming, and want the future-proofing of 5G, even if it means slightly less battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8050 in the Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8050 is a powerful chip, Mediatek has made significant strides in thermal management. The 6nm process helps with efficiency, and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G likely incorporates thermal solutions to mitigate heat. However, sustained, high-intensity gaming will inevitably generate heat; expect some throttling, but it shouldn't be severe enough to render the phone unusable.
❓ Is the 4G connectivity on the vivo Y400 4G a significant limitation in 2024?
For users in areas with robust 4G coverage, the lack of 5G on the vivo Y400 4G isn't necessarily a deal-breaker. However, 5G networks are expanding, and the Camon 20 Pro 5G offers future-proofing. If you anticipate frequent travel to areas with 5G or want to take advantage of faster speeds as they become available, the Tecno is the better choice.
❓ How much does the faster charging of the vivo Y400 4G actually translate to in real-world use?
The 44W charging on the Y400 will likely add around 30-45 minutes of usable battery life in a 15-20 minute charge compared to the 33W on the Tecno. However, the Dimensity 8050's power draw means the Tecno might deplete its battery faster, potentially narrowing the gap in overall daily usage.
