The vivo Y3s and Nokia C200 represent the extreme end of the budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point, but they achieve this with significantly different internal hardware. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how the chipset choices impact real-world performance and usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a slightly more responsive experience, the vivo Y3s is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio P35, with its octa-core CPU, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Nokia C200’s quad-core Helio A22, making it better suited for multitasking and app loading, despite both phones sharing the same 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE (2CA) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 21. Released 2020, October 26 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, Q2 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm (6.28 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 156.5 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.16 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190.5 g (6.74 oz) | 172.5 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1544 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.35 inches, 99.6 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8 | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Red | Meteor Black |
| Models | V1901A, V1901T | TA-1437, TA-1510 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y3s
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- Octa-core CPU handles multitasking better
- Potentially better camera image processing
- May consume slightly more battery
- Likely a similar basic display quality to the C200
Nokia C200
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding processor
- Simpler user experience for basic tasks
- Very affordable price point
- Significantly slower processor
- Struggles with multitasking and app loading
- Limited performance headroom
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context of these phones, we can assume both utilize LCD panels, likely with 720p+ resolution. The focus here isn't display quality, but rather the processing power needed to drive it. The Helio P35 in the Y3s has more headroom to handle display tasks without impacting overall performance, potentially leading to slightly smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement. However, given the price point, both phones likely feature basic camera setups. The Helio P35’s image signal processor (ISP) is more capable than the A22’s, meaning the Y3s will likely produce slightly better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Any differences in software processing will also be more effectively utilized by the more powerful chipset.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y3s’ Mediatek Helio P35 is an octa-core processor featuring four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Nokia C200’s Helio A22, a quad-core processor with all cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. While both are based on a 12nm process, the additional cores and higher clock speeds of the P35 translate to significantly better multi-tasking and app launch speeds. The A22 is designed for extremely basic tasks, and will struggle with anything beyond simple operations. The Y3s will feel noticeably snappier.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 10W wired charging, indicating a similar charging experience – expect around 2-3 hours for a full charge. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the less demanding Helio A22 in the Nokia C200 *could* result in slightly longer battery life, as it consumes less power. However, the Y3s’ more efficient use of resources during tasks might offset this, making real-world battery life comparable.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y3s if you need a phone capable of handling more than just basic calling and texting – light social media use, occasional photo taking, and smoother app transitions. Buy the Nokia C200 if your primary need is a simple, reliable device for calls, messaging, and minimal app usage, prioritizing simplicity and potentially longer battery life due to the less demanding processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the vivo Y3s handle popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly?
Yes, the Helio P35 processor in the vivo Y3s is capable of running apps like WhatsApp and Facebook without significant lag. While it won't offer a high-end experience, it will provide a usable and responsive experience for these common applications.
❓ Is the Nokia C200 suitable for someone who is not tech-savvy?
Absolutely. The Nokia C200’s simpler processor and software are ideal for users who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and basic communication. Its limited capabilities mean there are fewer features to learn and less chance of accidental complications.
❓ Can I play games on either of these phones?
Basic, less demanding games are playable on both, but don't expect a great experience. The Nokia C200 will struggle even with simple games, while the vivo Y3s can handle some lighter titles at low settings. Neither is suitable for modern, graphically intensive games.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge both phones?
With both phones utilizing 10W charging, expect a full charge to take approximately 2 to 3 hours from 0%. The charging speed is not a differentiating factor between these two devices.
