The smartphone landscape is littered with compelling options at every price point. This comparison pits the recently released vivo Y39, powered by Qualcomm’s efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, against the older, but once-premium, Oppo Reno 10x Zoom, boasting the Snapdragon 855. We’ll dissect which phone delivers the best experience in 2024, considering performance, camera capabilities, and battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the vivo Y39 emerges as the better choice. While the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom offers a legacy of flagship performance, the Y39’s modern 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 provides a more balanced experience with improved efficiency and faster charging, making it a more practical daily driver.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2019, April. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 74% in 60 min
Reverse wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lotus Purple, Ocean Blue | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue |
| Models | V2443, V2436 | CPH1919, PCCM00 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 1020 EUR |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.7 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8)
GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y39
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Significantly faster 44W charging
- Likely more refined image processing
- Missing display specifications
- Lacks the 10x optical zoom of the Reno 10x Zoom
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- 10x optical zoom camera
- Larger display size
- Potentially better build quality (flagship era)
- Older Snapdragon 855 prone to throttling
- Slower 20W charging
- Outdated image processing algorithms
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s display is rated at 440 nits of peak brightness, a figure that feels dated compared to modern panels. While the 'infinite' contrast ratio suggests deep blacks, it doesn’t compensate for the lower overall brightness. The vivo Y39’s display specifications are currently unavailable, but given its market positioning, it likely features a similar brightness level. However, the Reno 10x Zoom’s larger screen size is a clear advantage for media consumption. The lack of information on the Y39’s panel technology (LCD vs AMOLED) makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the Reno 10x Zoom’s age suggests potential color accuracy degradation.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specifics are lacking. The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s claim to fame was its 10x optical zoom, a feature the Y39 almost certainly lacks. However, the Reno 10x Zoom is an older device, and its image processing algorithms are less refined than those found in modern smartphones. Sensor size and aperture data are unavailable for both, making a direct comparison impossible. The Y39’s newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 likely provides better noise reduction and dynamic range in challenging lighting conditions. The Reno 10x Zoom’s advantage lies in its zoom capabilities, but the Y39’s modern processing could deliver more consistently pleasing results in everyday scenarios.
Performance
This is where the architectural differences shine. The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) was a flagship processor in its time, featuring an octa-core configuration with a Kryo 485 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz. However, the vivo Y39’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) utilizes a more modern and efficient process node. While the 855 boasts higher peak clock speeds, the 4nm process of the Y39’s chip translates to better thermal management and sustained performance. The Y39’s CPU, with its Cortex-A78 cores, offers a significant uplift over the older Cortex-A75 cores found in the 855, particularly in multi-threaded workloads. The Reno 10x Zoom is likely to exhibit throttling under sustained load, while the Y39 should maintain more consistent performance.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 107 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Reno 10x Zoom’s potentially larger battery capacity (unspecified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The vivo Y39 supports 44W wired charging, achieving 74% charge in 60 minutes, while the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom is limited to 20W. This means the Y39 can be topped up much faster, a significant convenience factor. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s efficiency further contributes to the Y39’s battery longevity, potentially offsetting any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y39 if you prioritize battery life, efficient performance for everyday tasks, and fast charging. It’s ideal for users who want a reliable smartphone experience without breaking the bank. Buy the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom if you specifically need the raw processing power for demanding applications or older games, and are willing to accept compromises in battery efficiency and charging speed. It caters to users who value a larger display and potentially better camera hardware, despite its age.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 855 in the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom struggle with modern apps and games?
Yes, while the Snapdragon 855 was a powerful chip, it's showing its age. Expect some stuttering and reduced frame rates in demanding games and apps compared to the vivo Y39's Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. The 855 is also more prone to thermal throttling, further impacting sustained performance.
❓ How much does the faster charging of the vivo Y39 improve the user experience?
The 44W charging on the Y39 is a game-changer. Reaching 74% charge in 60 minutes means you can quickly top up your phone during a short break, minimizing downtime. The Reno 10x Zoom’s 20W charging is significantly slower, requiring much longer to fully charge.
❓ Is the 10x zoom on the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom still relevant in 2024?
While the 10x zoom is a unique feature, the image quality at maximum zoom is likely to be inferior to the computational zoom capabilities of modern smartphones like the Y39. The Reno 10x Zoom’s older image processing algorithms may also struggle to produce consistently sharp and detailed images.
