vivo Y39 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Mid-Range Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset offers a noticeable performance edge, and the 68W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the vivo Y39 provides a solid baseline experience at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y39 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 74% in 60 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lotus Purple, Ocean Blue | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2443, V2436 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y39
- Potentially lower price point
- Power-efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Likely less powerful processor
- Display brightness likely lower
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- Battery capacity not specified
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the vivo Y39, whose display brightness is not specified. While both likely utilize OLED panels for vibrant colors, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness is a clear advantage. The lack of information on the Y39’s panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) suggests a more basic display experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited for both devices. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is expected to have a more sophisticated camera system, leveraging MediaTek’s Imagiq ISP. The absence of sensor size details for both phones makes a direct comparison difficult. It's reasonable to assume Motorola will prioritize image processing algorithms for better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Y39’s camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but the Edge 40 Neo is positioned to deliver more refined image quality.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) holds a performance advantage over the vivo Y39’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm). The Dimensity 7030 features slightly higher clocked Cortex-A78 cores (2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz) and a more mature process node, resulting in better overall CPU and GPU performance. While the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 benefits from a newer 4nm process for improved efficiency, the raw processing power of the Dimensity 7030 will be noticeable in demanding tasks and gaming. The Edge 40 Neo is likely to offer a smoother experience with graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery and charging department. Its 68W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 15 minutes, a significant advantage over the vivo Y39’s 44W charging, which takes 60 minutes to reach 74%. While the Edge 40 Neo’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80h indicate excellent battery life. The Y39’s battery capacity is also unknown, but the slower charging speed suggests a potentially smaller battery or less efficient charging circuitry.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y39 if you need a reliable daily driver with a focus on power efficiency and potentially a lower upfront cost. It's ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make occasional calls. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize smoother multitasking, gaming, and faster charging speeds. This phone is better suited for users who demand more from their smartphone and value a more responsive experience.