Poco X6 Pro vs. vivo Y38: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging and a brighter display, provides a superior experience, especially for gaming and multimedia. However, the vivo Y38’s efficiency is commendable for basic tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y38 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 02 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Dark Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y38
- Potentially better power efficiency with Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Sleek and modern design (assumed based on vivo's aesthetic)
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the X6 Pro
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Exceptional performance with Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Fast 67W charging with multiple protocols
- Bright and vibrant display (1148 nits)
- Potentially lower battery life compared to optimized devices
- May run warmer under heavy load
- Higher price tag
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Y38’s display specifications are not provided, it’s unlikely to match this peak brightness. The X6 Pro’s higher brightness translates to more vibrant colors and better contrast. We expect the X6 Pro to have a higher refresh rate as well, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, though this is not explicitly stated in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
The provided data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for the Poco X6 Pro, lacking specific sensor details. However, given its positioning, we anticipate a more sophisticated camera system than the Y38, potentially including a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). The Y38’s camera specifications are also absent, making a direct comparison difficult. It’s likely the Y38 will focus on providing adequate image quality for social media sharing, while the X6 Pro aims for more detailed and versatile photography.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, with its octa-core configuration (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510), is in a different league than the vivo Y38’s Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra utilizes newer CPU core designs (A715) and a more complex configuration, resulting in significantly higher multi-core and single-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience. The 4nm process node is shared by both, but the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s architecture allows it to leverage that efficiency for sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the Y38’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s longer runtime suggests a combination of efficient power management and a larger battery. Crucially, the X6 Pro supports 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0, enabling a full charge in just 45 minutes. The Y38’s 44W charging is slower, requiring more time to replenish the battery. This faster charging is a significant convenience factor for the X6 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y38 if you prioritize all-day battery life and a smooth experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and calls, and value a more power-efficient processor. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you’re a gamer, content creator, or simply demand the fastest possible performance in this price bracket, and appreciate faster charging speeds and a brighter screen.