vivo Y37 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the vivo Y37 Pro’s 44W, and the measured 10:28h active use score demonstrates superior endurance. However, the Y37 Pro offers a compelling value proposition for those seeking a power-efficient processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y37 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 36 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Gray, Green, Apricot | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2354A | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y37 Pro
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 processor
- Potentially better thermal management
- Competitive price point
- Slower 44W charging
- Likely less vibrant display
- Limited camera information
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Significantly faster 68W charging
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7030 processor
- Potentially more thermal throttling
- Higher price compared to Y37 Pro
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Y37 Pro, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Y37 Pro’s display specs are currently unknown, Motorola’s panel offers a superior viewing experience. The Edge 40 Neo’s brightness also suggests a potentially wider color gamut and better HDR support, enhancing video playback. We expect the Edge 40 Neo to have a higher contrast ratio as well.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. However, the absence of sensor size information for both devices makes a direct comparison difficult. We can assume the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, positioned as a more premium device, likely features a larger primary sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Y37 Pro’s camera system is likely geared towards providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, while the Edge 40 Neo may offer better low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of OIS on the Edge 40 Neo would be a significant advantage for video recording and handheld photography.
Performance
Both phones utilize an octa-core CPU configuration with a similar core layout (2x Cortex-A78 & 6x Cortex-A55), but the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Edge 40 Neo has a slightly higher peak clock speed (2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). More importantly, the Dimensity 7030 is fabricated on a 6nm process, while the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 uses a more efficient 4nm node. This suggests the Snapdragon will have better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during prolonged use. However, the Dimensity 7030’s higher clock speed may provide a slight edge in burst performance. The Y37 Pro’s 4nm process will likely result in better standby power consumption.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a clear winner, achieving a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, compared to the Y37 Pro’s 36 minutes. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While the Y37 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s measured 10:28h active use score demonstrates excellent endurance. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm process in the Y37 Pro should contribute to efficient power consumption, but the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging and proven battery life give it a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y37 Pro if you need a phone that prioritizes sustained performance and efficiency for everyday tasks, and value a newer processor architecture. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily rely on intensive gaming or video editing. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a brighter, more visually engaging display, and demand significantly faster charging speeds. This phone is better suited for multimedia consumption and users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost.