vivo Y37 Pro vs Google Pixel 7a: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. However, the vivo Y37 Pro offers a compelling alternative for those seeking faster charging and a more efficient processor for everyday tasks, all at a potentially lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y37 Pro | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 36 min Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Gray, Green, Apricot | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | V2354A | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
vivo Y37 Pro
- 44W Fast Charging – Significantly faster than the Pixel 7a.
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 – Good battery life for everyday use.
- Reverse Wired Charging – Can charge other devices.
- Likely Inferior Camera – Compared to the Pixel 7a’s computational photography.
- Less Powerful Processor – For demanding tasks and gaming.
Google Pixel 7a
- Superior Camera – Google’s image processing is a standout feature.
- Powerful Tensor G2 Chip – Excellent for AI tasks and performance.
- Guaranteed Software Updates – Longer support lifecycle.
- Slow 18W Charging – Takes significantly longer to recharge.
- Lower Charging Speed – Compared to the Y37 Pro’s 44W.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors. While the Y37 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be lower in peak brightness. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel, combined with its brightness, offers a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving, but the Pixel 7a’s superior brightness is a key advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a significant strength, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 7a’s reputation for excellent image processing, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, sets it apart. The Y37 Pro likely relies on a more conventional camera setup. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s image signal processor. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices, the Pixel 7a’s overall camera experience is expected to be more refined.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 cores, designed for peak performance. The vivo Y37 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), prioritizing efficiency with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. While the Tensor G2 excels in AI tasks and image processing, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 offers a strong balance of performance and power consumption for everyday use. The Pixel 7a’s LPDDR5x RAM likely provides faster memory speeds, further enhancing its multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting good battery life despite its smaller capacity (not specified). The Y37 Pro compensates with significantly faster 44W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 36 minutes. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging is considerably slower. While the Pixel 7a’s efficiency may offset the lower charging speed for some users, the Y37 Pro’s rapid charging is a major convenience factor. The Y37 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 7a.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y37 Pro if you need a phone that can rapidly recharge – its 44W charging is significantly faster than the Pixel 7a’s 18W. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost and prioritize efficiency in daily tasks. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a superior camera system, a cleaner Android experience with guaranteed updates, and the processing power needed for more demanding applications and computational photography.