Released in 2015, the vivo Y37 and HTC One E9+ represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Y37 focused on efficiency with a Snapdragon 615, while the E9+ aimed for more raw power with the Mediatek Helio X10. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device holds up better today, considering their original target audiences.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a functional device from this era, the HTC One E9+ emerges as the slightly better choice. While both offer similar battery endurance ratings, the Helio X10’s more powerful octa-core CPU provides a noticeable performance edge, making it more capable with demanding apps and multitasking, despite potential thermal concerns.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, August. Released 2015, August | 2015, March. Released 2015, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 154 x 77 x 6.8 mm (6.06 x 3.03 x 0.27 in) | 156.5 x 76.5 x 7.5 mm (6.16 x 3.01 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 150 g (5.29 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~534 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~69.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6795M Helio X10 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 405 | PowerVR G6200 |
| OS | Android 5.0 (Lollipop), Funtouch 2.1 | Android 5 (Lollipop), upgradable to 6 (Marshmallow), Sense UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 20 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide)
or
4 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3", 2µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR | 4.1, A2DP, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Music play | Up to 50 h | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 410 h (2G) / Up to 410 h (3G) | Up to 590 h (2G) / Up to 617 h (3G) |
| Talk time | Up to 14 h (2G) / Up to 12 h (3G) | Up to 21 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 14 h 20 min (3G) |
| Type | 2720 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 2800 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White | Meteor Gray, Classic Rose Gold, Gold Sepia |
| Models | - | One E9PLUS dual sim, E9pw |
| Price | - | About 320 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.34 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 59h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1657 (nominal), 2.305 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 61dB / Noise 62dB / Ring 66dB
|
| Performance | - |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 1227Basemark X: 9639 |
vivo Y37 (2015)
- Potentially better thermal management due to the Snapdragon 615's lower clock speeds.
- Efficient chipset for everyday tasks.
- Likely more affordable at the time of release.
- Lower CPU performance compared to the Helio X10.
- May struggle with demanding applications and multitasking.
- Camera specifications are unknown and likely average.
HTC One E9+
- More powerful CPU for faster performance.
- Better suited for gaming and demanding apps.
- Similar battery endurance to the vivo Y37.
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load.
- May consume battery faster during intensive tasks.
- Camera specifications are unknown and likely average.
Display Comparison
Both the vivo Y37 and HTC One E9+ share the same nominal contrast ratio of 1657, improving to 2305 in sunlight, suggesting similar outdoor visibility. However, the context data lacks specifics on panel type (IPS, AMOLED) or resolution. Given the 2015 timeframe and mid-range positioning, both likely utilized IPS LCD panels. The absence of information on refresh rates suggests standard 60Hz operation for both. The identical contrast ratios indicate a similar viewing experience in varying lighting conditions, but the overall visual quality will depend on the resolution, which is not provided.
Camera Comparison
The provided data only indicates that both devices feature photo and video capabilities, lacking any specifics on sensor size, aperture, or image processing. Given the market segment, it’s reasonable to assume both phones featured relatively modest camera setups. Without further information, it’s impossible to definitively assess camera quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device (a common trend in 2015) would likely offer limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and low resolution.
Performance
The HTC One E9+ boasts a significant CPU advantage with its Mediatek MT6795M Helio X10, featuring eight Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, compared to the vivo Y37’s Snapdragon 615 with a split core configuration (4x1.4 GHz & 4x1.0 GHz). While both utilize the Cortex-A53 architecture, the higher clock speed of the Helio X10 translates to faster processing speeds. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 28nm process, meaning thermal management will be a key factor. The Snapdragon 615’s more conservative clock speeds may result in less throttling under sustained load, while the Helio X10 could deliver bursts of higher performance but potentially at the cost of increased heat. The Y37's chipset is geared towards efficiency, while the E9+ prioritizes raw power.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the vivo Y37 and HTC One E9+ share an endurance rating of 59 hours. This suggests similar battery life despite the differing chipsets. The Helio X10’s higher power consumption is likely offset by a larger battery capacity within the E9+, or more aggressive power management software. Without knowing the actual battery capacities (mAh), it’s difficult to determine which device offers superior real-world battery performance. The 59-hour endurance rating suggests moderate usage patterns, and heavy users may experience shorter battery life on both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y37 (2015) if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on efficiency and potentially longer sustained performance due to the Snapdragon 615’s thermal profile. Buy the HTC One E9+ if you prefer a more responsive user experience and are willing to potentially trade some battery longevity for the increased processing power of the Helio X10, especially if you intend to run more demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Helio X10 prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio X10, while powerful for its time, was known to generate significant heat under sustained load. While the 28nm process isn't the most efficient, the primary concern is the CPU's clock speed. Expect some throttling during prolonged gaming, potentially reducing performance over time. The vivo Y37's Snapdragon 615 is likely to handle gaming more consistently, albeit at a lower frame rate.
❓ Given the age of these devices, what kind of software support can I expect?
Neither the vivo Y37 nor the HTC One E9+ are likely to receive any further software updates. Both devices are well past their end-of-life support dates. Users should expect to run older versions of Android, potentially with security vulnerabilities. Consider this a significant limitation if security is a primary concern.
❓ Would either of these phones be suitable for modern social media apps like TikTok or Instagram?
While both phones *can* run these apps, the experience will likely be sluggish. The limited RAM and processing power of both the Snapdragon 615 and Helio X10 will struggle with the demands of modern social media applications. Expect longer loading times, occasional lag, and potential crashes.
