OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite vs vivo Y36i: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders

The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite and vivo Y36i both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and essential features at an accessible price point. However, they take different approaches – OnePlus prioritizes rapid charging, while vivo focuses on a more recent chipset architecture. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite emerges as the stronger choice. Its 67W SuperVOOC charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695, built on a 6nm process, offers a slight edge in efficiency and sustained performance compared to the vivo Y36i’s Dimensity 6020. While the Y36i has a newer chipset, the charging speed difference is a significant real-world benefit.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo Y36i OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India
Launch
Announced2023, December 092023, April 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, JanuaryAvailable. Released 2023, April 11
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions163.7 x 75.4 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.32 in)165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)195 g (6.88 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass
Resolution720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density)
Size6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90Hz, 840 nits (HBM)IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 619
OSAndroid 13, OriginOS 3Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 -UFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF Anti-stroboscopic sensor-
Triple-108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single5 MP, f/1.8, (wide)16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging15W wired Reverse wired67W wired, 80% in 30 min
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsPurple, Gold, BlackPastel Lime, Chromatic Gray
ModelsV2318ACPH2467, CPH2465
PriceAbout 160 EUR£ 169.98 / € 209.99
SAR-1.17 W/kg (head)     0.70 W/kg (body)
Tests
Performance- AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo Y36i

  • Significantly faster 67W charging
  • Potentially better thermal management due to 6nm Snapdragon 695
  • Slightly better GPU performance for gaming

  • Chipset is an older generation compared to Dimensity 6020
  • Likely similar display quality to the vivo Y36i

OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite

  • More recent chipset architecture (Dimensity 6020)
  • Potentially better power efficiency (7nm process)
  • Reverse wired charging capability

  • Very slow 15W charging
  • Snapdragon 695 likely offers better sustained performance

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The absence of specified display details (resolution, refresh rate, peak brightness) suggests a focus on cost optimization. However, the choice of panel technology and its calibration will impact color accuracy and viewing angles. We anticipate both will offer adequate, but not exceptional, visual experiences.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses (likely depth or macro). The image processing algorithms will heavily influence the final image quality. Given the price point, expect decent performance in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low-light scenarios. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, which can introduce artifacts.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores clocked up to 2.2 GHz and 1.7 GHz respectively. The vivo Y36i employs the MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (7nm) with a similar core configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. While the Dimensity 6020 is architecturally newer, the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load. The Snapdragon's Adreno 619 GPU is also likely to offer a slight advantage in graphics performance. Both phones will handle everyday tasks smoothly, but the OnePlus is better positioned for moderate gaming.

Battery Life

The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s 67W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer. It promises an 80% charge in just 30 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. The vivo Y36i, with its 15W charging, will take considerably longer to fully charge. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the OnePlus effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. This is a crucial advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal charging time.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo Y36i if you prioritize a slightly newer chipset architecture and are comfortable with significantly slower 15W charging. This phone suits users who aren't heavy smartphone users and primarily need a reliable device for basic tasks. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you value fast charging above all else, and want a phone that can quickly top up its battery between uses, making it ideal for those with active lifestyles or who frequently use power-intensive apps.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it can handle Genshin Impact at lower settings (medium or low) with acceptable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense scenes. The Dimensity 6020 in the vivo Y36i will offer similar performance, but the Snapdragon's slightly better thermal management may lead to more consistent frame rates over longer gaming sessions.
❓ How long will it *actually* take to fully charge the vivo Y36i with its 15W charging?
Expect a full charge from 0% to 100% on the vivo Y36i to take approximately 2.5 to 3.5 hours with the included 15W charger. This is a significant difference compared to the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite's 30-minute 80% charge time. If you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your phone, the OnePlus is the clear winner.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
Neither device's specifications explicitly mention microSD card support. However, given the target market and price point, it's unlikely either phone offers this feature. Users should carefully consider their storage needs and choose a model with sufficient internal storage.