The vivo Y36 (India) and Xiaomi 12T Pro represent vastly different ends of the smartphone spectrum. The Y36 aims for affordability and essential functionality, while the 12T Pro packs flagship-level processing power and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and sufficient performance for daily tasks, the vivo Y36 offers a compelling package. However, the Xiaomi 12T Pro is the clear winner for power users, gamers, and those demanding the fastest possible charging speeds, justifying its higher price point with a significantly more capable Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 75 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, June 22 | 2022, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 22 | Available. Released 2022, October 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 76.2 x 8.2 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 650 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.47", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | Tuned by Harman Kardon
24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 30% in 15 min
Reverse wired | 120W wired, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Meteor Black, Vibrant Gold | Black, Silver, Blue |
| Models | - | 22081212UG, 22081212G |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 208.76 / € 167.62 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.07 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1032185 (v9)
GeekBench: 4081 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y36 (India)
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Significantly lower processing power
- Less capable camera system
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi 12T Pro
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Brighter and likely higher-quality display
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May require more frequent charging despite fast charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 12T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 913 nits, compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo Y36. While the Y36’s panel specifications are unknown, the 12T Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a high-quality AMOLED panel. This brightness advantage translates to better visibility outdoors. The 12T Pro’s display is likely to offer a smoother experience if it incorporates a higher refresh rate, a common feature in flagship devices, which is absent from the Y36’s specifications.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking for the vivo Y36. The Xiaomi 12T Pro, being a flagship, likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). While the Y36 may suffice for casual photography, the 12T Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions, and more versatile video recording options. The absence of details on the Y36’s camera suggests a focus on cost reduction, potentially resulting in a less capable imaging experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 12T Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a generational leap ahead of the vivo Y36’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores, offering substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. The 680’s Kryo 265 cores, while efficient, are geared towards everyday tasks, not intensive gaming. The 4nm process node of the 8+ Gen 1 also provides superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. This means the 12T Pro will maintain peak performance for longer periods.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 91 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Y36’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging speeds are dramatically different. The Xiaomi 12T Pro’s 120W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 19 minutes, a significant advantage over the vivo Y36’s 44W charging, which takes 15 minutes to reach 30%. The 12T Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Y36, adding to its convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y36 (India) if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday communication, social media, and light tasks, and prioritize long-term battery life over raw performance. Buy the Xiaomi 12T Pro if you demand a fluid experience for demanding games, video editing, or multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y36 sufficient for playing PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a stable experience. It's not optimized for demanding gaming like the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Xiaomi 12T Pro, which can handle PUBG Mobile at maximum settings with ease.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Xiaomi 12T Pro compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y36 in real-world use?
The 120W charging on the 12T Pro is dramatically faster. It can fully charge the phone in 19 minutes, while the Y36 takes considerably longer to reach 100%. This means you can quickly top up the 12T Pro during short breaks, whereas the Y36 requires a more substantial charging period.
❓ Does the Xiaomi 12T Pro get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its thermal efficiency, but sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. The 12T Pro likely incorporates cooling mechanisms to mitigate throttling, but some heat buildup is expected. The 680 in the Y36 will generate less heat, but also offer significantly lower performance.
