The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y35 and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both devices aim to deliver a solid experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in chipset choice. This comparison will dissect those differences, helping you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the vivo Y35’s Snapdragon 680, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While the Y35 offers respectable battery life, the X5 Pro’s faster charging and overall capabilities justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 15 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 15 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8.3 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 550 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 34 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dawn Gold, Agate Black | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 100 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y35
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Stable and reliable Snapdragon 680 chipset for basic tasks
- 44W fast charging with reverse wired capability
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X5 Pro
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Display specifications are less impressive
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset for gaming and multitasking
- Bright 912 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo Y35
- Battery life is comparable, but not superior, to the Y35
- Camera details are limited beyond 'photo/video' capabilities
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 912 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y35. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays share an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the X5 Pro’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. Details regarding panel technology (e.g., AMOLED vs. IPS LCD) and refresh rate are missing for the Y35, suggesting a more basic display experience. The X5 Pro’s display is geared towards a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information (megapixel count, sensor size, aperture) for the vivo Y35, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The Poco X5 Pro likely benefits from the more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 778G, enabling better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. The usefulness of any 2MP macro cameras on either phone is questionable, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X5 Pro’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y35’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The 778G features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – versus the Y35’s 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver. This translates to significantly faster application loading times, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience on the Poco X5 Pro. The 5G connectivity of the X5 Pro is also a key differentiator. While both are built on a 6nm process, the architectural improvements in the 778G provide a clear performance lead.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Poco X5 Pro’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support is significantly faster than the vivo Y35’s 44W charging. The X5 Pro can reach 100% charge in 45 minutes, while the Y35 takes 34 minutes to reach 70%. Both offer 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. The faster charging speed of the X5 Pro provides a more convenient user experience, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y35 if you prioritize a consistently stable, if less powerful, experience and value a slightly more conservative design. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse social media, make calls, and engage in light multitasking. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you demand more processing power for gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if 5G connectivity is a must-have feature. It’s the better option for power users and those seeking future-proofing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y35 struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 680 is a budget-oriented chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect occasional stuttering and longer loading times compared to the Poco X5 Pro.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Poco X5 Pro compare to standard fast charging?
The 67W charging on the Poco X5 Pro is considerably faster than typical fast charging solutions. It supports Power Delivery 3.0 (PD3.0) and Quick Charge 4 (QC4), allowing it to fully charge the device in approximately 45 minutes, a significant time saving over slower charging methods.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the vivo Y35 a cause for concern?
Yes, the limited camera information suggests the Y35’s camera system is likely a basic setup. While it will be adequate for casual snapshots, don’t expect exceptional image quality or advanced features like OIS. The Poco X5 Pro, with its more powerful chipset, likely has a more capable image signal processor.
❓ Will the Poco X5 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G 5G is generally efficient, but prolonged gaming can generate heat. The Poco X5 Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating, but performance throttling may occur during very demanding games. It's less prone to overheating than older, more powerful chipsets.
