Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming, especially with so many options available. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the vivo Y35 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A34. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one deserves your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 emerges as the stronger contender, boasting a brighter display, more powerful chipset, faster charging, and a generally more polished software experience. While the vivo Y35 5G offers decent value, the A34's overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 09 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 09 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS Ocean | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black, Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | V2230A | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y35 5G
- Sleek design
- 5G connectivity
- Decent value for money
- Good for basic usage
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- Less vibrant display
- Limited software support compared to Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More powerful chipset
- Faster charging
- Excellent battery life
- Longer software support
- Reputable brand
- Potentially higher price
- Samsung's One UI can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its 1009 nits max brightness provides excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a significant advantage over the Y35 5G. The A34's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and richer colors, further enhancing the viewing experience. The Y35 5G's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the A34.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Galaxy A34 is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Samsung's image processing is generally well-regarded. The Y35 5G's camera is decent for everyday snapshots, but it doesn't match the A34's capabilities. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Galaxy A34's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Y35 5G's Dimensity 700. This translates to smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and better gaming performance. The A34's Cortex-A78 cores offer a significant performance boost over the Y35 5G's Cortex-A76 cores.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive battery life with an endurance rating of 133h. However, the Galaxy A34's 25W charging is faster than the Y35 5G's 15W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y35 5G is a good choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize a sleek design and basic 5G connectivity. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is ideal for those seeking a reliable, feature-rich phone with a vibrant display, strong performance, and a longer software support commitment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the vivo Y35 5G's Dimensity 700.
❓ How long will Samsung support the Galaxy A34 with software updates?
Samsung typically provides 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates for its A-series phones, offering longer software support than vivo.
