The budget 5G smartphone market is heating up, and the vivo Y35 5G and Oppo A78 are two strong contenders. Both offer 5G connectivity and decent specs at an affordable price, but which one truly delivers the best value? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A78 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 33W charging, which is a game-changer for daily use. While both phones share the same chipset, the A78's charging advantage and potentially slightly better software experience make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | IP54 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 09 | 2023, January 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 09 | Available. Released 2023, January 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Black, Blue | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple |
| Models | V2230A | CPH2483, CPH2495 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 |
vivo Y35 5G
- Clean Software Experience
- Understated Design
- Decent Performance for the Price
- Slow 15W Charging
- Average Camera Performance
- Potentially Less Feature-Rich Software
Oppo A78
- Fast 33W Charging
- Feature-Rich Software (ColorOS)
- Good Value for Money
- Potentially More Bloatware
- Design Might Be Too Busy for Some
- Average Camera Performance
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 6.5-inch FHD+ displays, potentially with a 90Hz refresh rate. Expect vibrant colors and decent viewing angles, though neither will be flagship-level. The Oppo A78 might have slightly better color calibration based on Oppo's typical display tuning.
Camera Comparison
The vivo Y35 5G likely features a 50MP main camera, while the Oppo A78 is expected to have a similar setup. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Expect decent daytime shots, but low-light performance might be average on both. Video recording capabilities should be comparable.
Performance
Sharing the same Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset and CPU configuration, expect comparable performance in everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Don't expect to run demanding games at high settings, but both should handle social media, browsing, and streaming without issue. Software optimization could be a differentiating factor here.
Battery Life
The Oppo A78's 33W fast charging is a major advantage. The vivo Y35 5G's 15W charging will take considerably longer to fully charge the battery. Both phones likely have a 5000mAh battery, suggesting similar battery life under moderate usage, but the Oppo A78's charging speed makes it more convenient.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y35 5G is a good option for users prioritizing a clean software experience and a slightly more understated design. The Oppo A78 is ideal for those who value fast charging and a more feature-rich software experience, even if it means a slightly busier design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
While both have a 5000mAh battery, the Oppo A78's faster charging means it's more convenient to top up, effectively giving it a better overall battery experience.
❓ Is the Dimensity 700 chipset good for gaming?
The Dimensity 700 is adequate for casual gaming and less demanding titles. However, don't expect high frame rates or smooth performance in graphically intensive games.
