The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and the vivo Y33t represent compelling options in the crowded budget and mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they diverge significantly in their core strengths. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G prioritizes 5G connectivity and rapid charging, while the vivo Y33t focuses on providing a dependable experience with a more conservative chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and speed, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and blazing-fast 67W charging significantly outperform the vivo Y33t’s Snapdragon 680 and 18W charging. However, the Y33t remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget who don't require 5G or ultra-fast charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 11 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 11 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black, Midday Dream | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y33t
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Potentially better performance with Snapdragon 695
- Potentially higher price point
- May have more bloatware (typical of Xiaomi)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- More affordable price
- Reliable Snapdragon 680 chipset for basic tasks
- Decent battery life (115h endurance)
- Slow 18W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, suggesting a significantly more visible display in outdoor conditions compared to the vivo Y33t, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize LCD panels given their price points, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also features an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of LCDs, but the lack of specific display details for the Y33t makes a direct comparison difficult. Bezels and color accuracy are also unknown for the Y33t, further solidifying the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s advantage in display specifications.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture information, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will heavily depend on the primary sensor and software algorithms. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras (e.g., 2MP macro) in this segment suggests that focusing on the main sensor’s specifications is crucial. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, given Xiaomi’s camera-focused marketing, likely prioritizes camera performance more than the Y33t.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with a CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver, while the vivo Y33t features the Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm) with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver. The 695’s 5G modem is a key differentiator, enabling faster download and upload speeds where available. Architecturally, the Kryo 660 cores in the 695 are a generation newer and generally more efficient than the Kryo 265 cores in the 680. While both are 6nm chips, the 695’s CPU clock speeds and core configuration suggest a performance edge, particularly in multi-threaded tasks. The Y33t's higher peak CPU clock speed doesn't necessarily translate to better real-world performance due to the core architecture and overall system optimization.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite the lack of specific mAh capacities for the Y33t. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3, achieving 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The vivo Y33t, in contrast, offers only 18W wired charging and 2.5W reverse wired charging. This means the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G can be topped up much faster, mitigating any potential battery life differences. The convenience of rapid charging is a significant advantage for the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33t if you need a reliable, everyday smartphone with a focus on value and don't anticipate heavy gaming or demanding tasks. It's ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prioritize 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, require significantly faster charging, and occasionally engage in mobile gaming or resource-intensive applications. It’s the better choice for users who want a phone that can keep up with a more demanding lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 680 in the Y33t?
While the Snapdragon 695 is more powerful, it also generates more heat. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G *may* experience more thermal throttling during prolonged gaming, but Xiaomi typically implements thermal management solutions to mitigate this. The Snapdragon 680 in the Y33t will likely remain cooler, but at the cost of performance. Actual thermal performance depends on the phone's cooling system and ambient temperature.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G worth the extra cost if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
If 5G coverage is sparse or unavailable in your location, the 5G capability of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G offers limited immediate benefit. However, investing in a 5G phone future-proofs your device for when 5G infrastructure expands. If you primarily rely on Wi-Fi and 4G, the Y33t’s value proposition becomes more compelling.
❓ How does the 18W charging on the vivo Y33t compare to older, slower charging standards?
18W charging is a relatively slow standard by today's measures. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours. Compared to older 5W or 10W chargers, it's a noticeable improvement, but it falls far short of the rapid charging capabilities offered by the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 67W charging.
