The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y33t and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into every aspect, from display and performance to camera and battery life, to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 edges out the vivo Y33t thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and generally more polished software experience. While both share the same chipset, the Redmi Note 11 provides a more complete package for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 11 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 11 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black, Midday Dream | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | - | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | About 230 EUR | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | - | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y33t
- Clean Android experience
- Reverse wireless charging
- Decent performance for the price
- Slower charging speed
- Likely lower display brightness
- Less polished software
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Fast 33W charging
- Brighter display
- Good battery life
- Feature-rich software
- Potential for bloatware (depending on region)
- Design might be less premium
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 boasts a measured peak brightness of 736 nits, significantly brighter than the Y33t's likely lower brightness. While both have similar resolutions and panel types (likely AMOLED for Redmi and IPS for Y33t), the Redmi's brightness advantage makes it better for outdoor use. The Redmi's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but generally indicates good contrast.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable given the shared chipset. Both phones will likely feature a main sensor around 50MP. The Redmi Note 11 might have a slight edge in image processing due to Xiaomi's software expertise. Low-light performance will be similar, relying heavily on software algorithms.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680, meaning core performance will be very similar. Day-to-day tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming will feel responsive on both devices. However, the Redmi Note 11's software optimization might offer a slightly smoother experience.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11's endurance rating of 126 hours is impressive, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Y33t also offers good battery life, the Redmi Note 11 likely has a larger capacity battery. The Redmi Note 11's 33W charging is a major advantage over the Y33t's 18W charging, allowing for much faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y33t is a good option for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and potentially reverse wireless charging. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is ideal for those who value fast charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a slightly more feature-rich software.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 generally offers better battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 126 hours. While the Y33t has good battery life, the Redmi's larger capacity and efficient chipset give it an edge.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 chipset good for gaming?
The Snapdragon 680 is suitable for casual gaming. It can handle most games at medium settings, but demanding titles might require lower graphics settings for smooth gameplay on both devices.
