The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G and the vivo Y33t represent compelling options in the sub-$300 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver value, they take distinctly different approaches. The Poco X4 Pro 5G prioritizes 5G connectivity and rapid charging, while the vivo Y33t focuses on a streamlined experience with a more power-efficient processor. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better buy. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 67W charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just over 40 minutes. While the Y33t offers decent efficiency, the Poco's overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 11 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 11 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black, Midday Dream | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y33t
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G processor
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Camera details are limited
- Software experience can be cluttered with Xiaomi's MIUI
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 processor
- 2.5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially longer battery life for light users
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Slow 18W charging
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like resolution, peak brightness, and refresh rate are missing for the Y33t. The Poco X4 Pro 5G likely benefits from a higher peak brightness typical of Xiaomi's displays, resulting in better outdoor visibility. Without more data on the Y33t's panel, it's difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the Poco.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Xiaomi generally equips its Poco line with competitive camera systems for the price. The Y33t's camera performance is likely more basic, focusing on adequate image capture in good lighting conditions. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver – compared to the vivo Y33t’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm) with its 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver. This translates to a tangible performance advantage for the Poco in multitasking and graphically intensive applications. The 5G modem in the 695 also provides future-proofing, while the Y33t is limited to 4G. Both utilize a 6nm process, suggesting similar efficiency, but the 695's architecture is more modern.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite the Y33t's unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, with a 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, is significantly faster than the Y33t’s 18W charging. This difference is crucial for users who prioritize minimizing downtime. The Y33t does offer 2.5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature absent on the Poco.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33t if you prioritize long-term battery life and a consistently smooth experience for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media. You'll appreciate the efficiency of the Snapdragon 680. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, and if you value the convenience of incredibly fast charging and future-proofing with 5G connectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G powerful enough for demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver the same performance as flagship chipsets, it provides a smooth gaming experience for most users. The 6nm process also helps with thermal management during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y33t in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can go from 0% to 100% in approximately 41 minutes, while the Y33t will likely take over two hours with its 18W charger. This means you can quickly top up the Poco X4 Pro 5G during short breaks, whereas the Y33t requires a much longer charging period.
❓ Does the Poco X4 Pro 5G support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 5G modem in the Poco X4 Pro 5G supports carrier aggregation, which allows it to combine multiple 5G channels for faster and more reliable data speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This is a significant advantage over devices with limited 5G capabilities.
