The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y33t and Samsung Galaxy A14 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 edges out the vivo Y33t thanks to its potentially more versatile chipset (depending on the version), slightly better display, and Samsung's software support. While the Y33t boasts faster charging and a decent processor, the A14 offers a more well-rounded experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 11 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 11 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black, Midday Dream | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | - | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y33t
- Faster charging (18W)
- Reverse wired charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Less versatile camera system
- Lower display quality compared to A14
- Potentially less software support
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Larger and potentially better display
- More versatile camera system (often with ultrawide)
- Samsung's One UI software
- Potentially better long-term software updates (depending on region)
- Slower charging (15W)
- Helio G80 chipset can be less efficient (Version A)
- AExynos 850 version may have slightly lower performance than Snapdragon 680
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 generally features a larger display (6.6 inches vs. 6.51 inches on the Y33t) and often a slightly higher resolution (FHD+ vs FHD+). While both use LCD panels, the A14's display often exhibits better color accuracy and brightness. The Y33t's display is perfectly adequate, but the A14 offers a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 typically features a more versatile camera system, often including a higher-resolution main sensor and an ultrawide lens. The vivo Y33t usually has a decent main camera, but lacks the versatility of the A14's setup. Image quality on the A14 is generally better, especially in low light, thanks to its larger sensor and image processing algorithms.
Performance
The vivo Y33t's Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is generally considered more efficient than the Helio G80 (12nm) in the A14. However, the AExynos 850 version of the A14 (8nm) can offer comparable or even slightly better performance in some scenarios. Both phones handle everyday tasks well, but demanding games might struggle on either device. The Snapdragon 680's efficiency can translate to better real-world battery life despite the charging speed difference.
Battery Life
The vivo Y33t has a slight edge in charging speed with 18W wired charging and 2.5W reverse wired charging, compared to the A14's 15W wired charging. However, both phones have large batteries (typically around 5000mAh), offering all-day battery life for moderate users. The Snapdragon 680's efficiency can help the Y33t maintain battery life despite the slower charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y33t is a good choice for users prioritizing fast charging and a smooth, albeit not blazing-fast, experience. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is ideal for those seeking a reliable, feature-rich phone with a good display and Samsung's One UI, and potentially better long-term software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
While both are budget phones, the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y33t generally offers slightly better efficiency, but the AExynos 850 version of the A14 can be comparable. Neither is ideal for demanding games.
❓ How long will Samsung provide software updates for the Galaxy A14?
Samsung typically provides 4 years of security updates and 3 major Android OS upgrades for their A-series phones, which is generally better than what vivo offers.
