The vivo Y33t and Oppo Reno7 5G both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Y33t focuses on affordability and efficiency with its Snapdragon 680, while the Reno7 5G aims for a more balanced experience with the Dimensity 900 and a significantly faster charging solution. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more powerful processor, the Oppo Reno7 5G is the better choice. Its 65W charging, capable of a full charge in just 31 minutes, is a significant advantage. However, the vivo Y33t offers a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 11 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 11 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black, Midday Dream | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y33t
- Excellent value for money
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- 2.5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely less powerful camera system
- Display specifications are basic
Oppo Reno7 5G
- 65W SuperVOOC charging (31 min full charge)
- More powerful Dimensity 900 processor
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Higher price point
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors compared to the Y33t (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the Reno7’s display benefits from an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, likely indicating a superior panel technology for deeper blacks. The Y33t’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a more basic LCD panel, potentially impacting color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Reno7 5G’s brand positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system with potentially better image processing algorithms. The Y33t likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Y33t is a common inclusion in this segment, but its practical utility is often limited due to low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The Oppo Reno7 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 900, featuring 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offers a performance edge over the vivo Y33t’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. The Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 cores provide a significant boost in single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launching and smoother multitasking. The Snapdragon 680, with its 4x 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x 1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores, is more focused on efficiency. While both are built on a 6nm process, the architectural differences favor the Reno7 5G for more demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Oppo Reno7 5G’s 65W wired charging, achieving 100% charge in just 31 minutes, is a game-changer for users who value convenience. The vivo Y33t’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to fully replenish the battery. The Y33t also offers 2.5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for topping up accessories, while the Reno7 5G also supports reverse wired charging, though the wattage is unspecified.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33t if you need a reliable, long-lasting phone for everyday tasks and prioritize battery life over raw performance, and are on a tight budget. Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding apps, value incredibly fast charging, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more refined overall package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 900 in the Oppo Reno7 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 900 is a capable processor, it can experience some thermal throttling under sustained heavy load, such as extended gaming. However, Oppo's software optimizations and the phone's cooling system are designed to mitigate this, and most users won't encounter significant issues during typical gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 680 in the Y33t is less prone to throttling due to its lower performance ceiling.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the vivo Y33t actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
The 2MP macro camera on the Y33t is a common feature in this price range, but its image quality is often limited. Due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization, macro shots tend to be soft and lack detail. It's best used for casual snapshots rather than serious photography.
❓ Can the Oppo Reno7 5G support 90fps gameplay in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
The Oppo Reno7 5G *can* achieve high frame rates in PUBG Mobile, but it depends on the graphics settings and the specific device configuration. While the Dimensity 900 is capable, you may need to lower the graphics settings to 'Smooth' or 'Balanced' to consistently maintain 90fps. The Y33t will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding games like PUBG.
