The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) and the vivo Y33s represent distinct approaches to the budget and mid-range smartphone market. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ aims for a premium experience with rapid charging and 5G connectivity, while the vivo Y33s focuses on providing a reliable, everyday experience at a lower price point. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging, offers a significantly faster and more convenient experience. However, the vivo Y33s remains a viable option for those prioritizing affordability and a simpler user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 24 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 24 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black, Midday Dream | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | V2109 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo Y33s
- Significantly faster charging (67W)
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Likely higher price point
- Potential for more software bloat (Xiaomi's MIUI)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- More affordable price
- Simpler, potentially cleaner software experience
- Adequate performance for basic tasks
- Slower charging (18W)
- No 5G connectivity
- Less powerful Helio G80 chipset
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in their processing power, impacting overall responsiveness. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G benefits from the more efficient Snapdragon 695, potentially allowing for smoother animations and faster app loading times. The Y33s, with its Helio G80, will be adequate for basic tasks, but may exhibit slight lag during intensive use. Display specifics like resolution and refresh rate are missing, but the chipset difference is the key differentiator here.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s likely inclusion of a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 695 chipset suggests superior image processing capabilities. The Y33s’ Helio G80 ISP is geared towards basic image capture. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ is likely to deliver better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of OIS data for either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance definitively.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) boasts a clear advantage in performance thanks to its Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) chipset. This 6nm process node is significantly more efficient than the 12nm process used in the vivo Y33s’ MediaTek Helio G80. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, outperform the Helio G80’s Cortex-A75 cores (2.0 GHz) in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks. This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ also benefits from 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the Y33s.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. Advertised 0-100% in 42 minutes is a substantial improvement over the vivo Y33s’ 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The 50% charge in 15 minutes claim further highlights the convenience offered by the Redmi Note 11 Pro+. The Y33s’ 5W reverse wired charging is a niche feature, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering broader compatibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33s if you need a dependable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and prioritize a lower upfront cost. You'll appreciate its simplicity and adequate performance for everyday use. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize faster performance, 5G connectivity, and significantly quicker charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more future-proof device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. While not a flagship chipset, its improved GPU performance over the Helio G80 in the vivo Y33s will result in fewer frame drops and a more enjoyable gaming session. Expect to prioritize graphics settings over maximum frame rates.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y33s slow compared to modern standards?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow by today's standards. It will take considerably longer to fully charge the vivo Y33s compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours, making it less convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in app loading times between the two phones?
Yes, you will likely notice a significant difference. The Snapdragon 695’s faster CPU and more efficient architecture will result in noticeably quicker app launches and smoother multitasking compared to the Helio G80. This difference will be particularly apparent with larger, more complex applications.
