The vivo Y33s and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Y33s aims for affordability with a focus on essential features, while the A53 5G attempts to deliver a more premium experience with 5G connectivity and a brighter display. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smoother overall experience and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. Its Exynos 1280 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Y33s' Helio G80, justifying the price difference for those who multitask or game frequently.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 24 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 24 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black, Midday Dream | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | V2109 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 210 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9)
GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y33s
- More affordable price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Decent battery life for basic use
- Significantly weaker processor
- Likely lower display quality
- Limited camera capabilities
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Faster and more efficient processor
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster charging speeds
- 5G connectivity
- Higher price tag
- No reverse wireless charging
- Potential for software bloat (Samsung)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 830 nits, compared to the vivo Y33s which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be considerably lower. This difference translates to superior visibility outdoors. While the Y33s’ display resolution isn’t specified, the A53’s FHD+ resolution ensures sharper visuals. Samsung’s claim of an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, while a marketing term, suggests a strong black level performance, enhancing the viewing experience. The A53’s panel technology is likely Super AMOLED, known for vibrant colors, while the Y33s likely uses an IPS LCD, offering decent color accuracy but lacking the contrast and vibrancy of AMOLED.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited for the Y33s. The A53 5G likely features a more sophisticated camera system, benefiting from Samsung’s image processing algorithms. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the A53’s likely larger main sensor and potential for Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would result in better low-light performance and sharper images. The Y33s’ camera is likely geared towards casual photography, while the A53 aims for a more versatile and higher-quality experience. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the Y33s is unlikely to provide significant benefit due to its limited resolution and sensor size.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is powered by the Exynos 1280 (5nm), while the vivo Y33s utilizes the MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm). The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 provides superior power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained performance under load. The Exynos 1280’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is a step up from the Y33s’ 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the A53. While both phones feature an octa-core CPU, the architectural advantages of the Exynos 1280 are substantial.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y33s and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the A53 5G supports 25W wired charging, significantly faster than the Y33s’ 18W charging. This means the A53 can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. The Y33s does offer 5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for topping up accessories, but the A53 lacks this capability. The efficiency gains from the Exynos 1280’s 5nm process may also contribute to slightly better real-world battery performance on the A53.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33s if you need a functional, reliable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are on a very tight budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prioritize a smoother user experience, a brighter and more color-accurate display for media consumption, and the future-proofing of 5G connectivity, even if it means spending more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1280 can get warm under heavy load, its 5nm fabrication process and Samsung's thermal management solutions generally prevent significant throttling. Users report manageable temperatures during extended gaming, though performance may dip slightly after an hour of continuous play. The Y33s' Helio G80 is more prone to throttling due to its less efficient 12nm process.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the vivo Y33s actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Unfortunately, the 2MP macro camera on the Y33s is unlikely to deliver truly detailed close-up photos. The small sensor size and low resolution result in images that often lack sharpness and clarity. It's primarily a marketing feature and won't compete with dedicated macro lenses or the main sensors on higher-end phones.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G reliably maintain 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G can generally maintain 60fps in PUBG Mobile with graphics settings set to 'Balanced'. However, achieving consistently smooth performance at the highest settings ('HD' and 'Extreme') may require reducing the frame rate to 'Smooth' or 'Balanced'. The Exynos 1280 provides sufficient power for enjoyable gaming, but it's not a flagship-level gaming processor.
