The vivo Y33e and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their internal hardware and feature sets. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a brighter display and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is the superior choice. Its Exynos 1280 chipset and 25W charging offer a noticeable performance and convenience advantage, despite the similar battery endurance rating. However, the Y33e remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | V2166A | SM-A336E, SM-A336B, SM-A336B/DS, SM-A336B/DSN, SM-A336E/DS, SM-A336M, SM-A3360 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 174.99 / € 187.50 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 354420 (v8), 394918 (v9)
GeekBench: 1900 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y33e
- More affordable price point
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Acceptable battery life
- Slower processor
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely lower quality display
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
- Faster and more efficient Exynos 1280 chipset
- Significantly faster 25W charging
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Higher price tag
- May not offer a dramatically better camera experience
- Similar battery endurance to the Y33e
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 728 nits, compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo Y33e. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While both displays are likely LCD panels given the price bracket, the A33’s higher peak brightness translates to a more enjoyable viewing experience in direct sunlight. The A33’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a standard LCD contrast ratio, while the Y33e’s contrast ratio is not specified. Bezels are likely comparable, but the superior brightness gives the A33 a clear edge.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume the A33 will offer a more refined camera experience. The A33 likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more vibrant and detailed photos. The Y33e’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but Samsung’s history suggests a stronger emphasis on camera performance.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) chipset represents a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y33e’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Exynos 1280 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, offering a performance advantage over the Y33e’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 also contributes to improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. While both phones share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, the A33’s more powerful primary cores will result in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The Y33e will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the A33 is better equipped for demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y33e and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Y33e is limited to 10W wired charging, resulting in a significantly longer charge time. The A33 5G supports 25W wired charging, allowing for a much faster 0-100% charge. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While both phones offer all-day battery life for moderate users, the A33’s faster charging provides a more flexible experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33e if you need a functional 5G smartphone with basic features and are operating on a very limited budget. It's a solid choice for essential communication and light social media use. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G if you prioritize a more responsive user experience, a brighter and more vibrant display for media consumption, and the convenience of significantly faster 25W charging. It's ideal for users who multitask, game occasionally, and value a more polished overall experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A33 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1280 is generally well-managed in terms of thermals. While it can get warm during extended gaming, it's unlikely to experience significant throttling due to its 5nm fabrication process and Samsung's thermal management solutions. However, sustained peak performance will inevitably generate heat.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either of these phones actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget phones offer limited utility. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. They are often included as a marketing feature rather than a genuinely useful photographic tool. Expect passable results only in ideal lighting conditions.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G reliably maintain 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A33 5G can achieve 60fps in PUBG Mobile, but it may require adjusting graphics settings to medium or low for consistent performance. Expect some frame drops during intense action sequences, but overall, the gaming experience should be smooth and enjoyable.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the vivo Y33e with its 10W charger?
With its 10W charging, the vivo Y33e will likely take over 3 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. This is a significant drawback compared to the A33's 25W charging, which can achieve a full charge in around 1 hour and 30 minutes.
