The sub-$200 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y33e and Oppo K10x both aim to deliver connectivity and essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The Y33e focuses on a balance of features, while the K10x prioritizes rapid charging and a slightly more modern chipset.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and future-proofing, the Oppo K10x is the better choice. Its 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695, built on a 6nm process, offers a slight efficiency advantage over the Y33e’s Dimensity 700. However, the Y33e remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 30 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Blue, Black |
| Models | V2166A | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 210 EUR |
vivo Y33e
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable MediaTek Dimensity 700 processor
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Less efficient chipset compared to Snapdragon 695
- Likely less refined software experience
Oppo K10x
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- More efficient Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- May be slightly more expensive
- Software experience may include bloatware
- Camera performance dependent on sensor quality
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable, the focus here is on functionality over fidelity. Bezels are expected to be noticeable on both, and neither is likely to feature high refresh rates. The display experience will be adequate for media consumption and general use, but not exceptional.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature a primary camera supplemented by depth and macro sensors of limited utility. The aperture and sensor size of the main camera will be the determining factors in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Image processing algorithms will also play a significant role, with Oppo typically favoring more vibrant, saturated images, while vivo often aims for a more natural look. Expect similar performance in daylight, but the K10x may have a slight edge in low-light due to the more efficient chipset allowing for more complex processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10x’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) offers a slight architectural advantage over the vivo Y33e’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling during sustained workloads. Both CPUs feature a similar core configuration – 2x high-performance cores and 6x efficiency cores – but the Kryo 660 Gold cores in the Snapdragon 695 are generally considered to offer a small performance edge. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both likely fall in the 5000mAh range, typical for this segment. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The vivo Y33e is limited to 10W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take several hours. The Oppo K10x, with its 67W SuperVOOC charging, can reach 80% charge in just 33 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who value convenience and need to quickly top up their battery. The faster charging effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y33e if you need a functional 5G smartphone with a reliable processor for everyday tasks and aren't concerned about extremely fast charging. Buy the Oppo K10x if you prioritize minimizing charging time, appreciate a more efficient chipset, and want a phone that can keep up with a faster-paced lifestyle. The K10x is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it provides a playable experience for casual gamers. The Dimensity 700 in the Y33e will offer similar performance.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo K10x compared to the 10W charging on the vivo Y33e?
The difference is substantial. The K10x can reach 80% charge in approximately 33 minutes, while the Y33e will take several hours for a full charge. This means you can quickly top up the K10x during a short break, whereas the Y33e requires overnight charging.
❓ Does the Oppo K10x support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Support for VoLTE and VoWiFi depends on your carrier. The Snapdragon 695 modem generally supports these technologies, but carrier compatibility is crucial. Check with your mobile provider to confirm support.
❓ Is the camera on either phone good enough for social media uploads?
Both phones will produce acceptable results for social media in good lighting conditions. However, don't expect flagship-level image quality. The K10x *may* have a slight advantage in low-light scenarios due to the more efficient chipset allowing for better image processing.
